https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32420
--- Comment #7 from Regis Perdreau ---
up diagonal strike still missing in 6.3 master...
May be something we can derivate from overstrike.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32420
--- Comment #6 from Regis Perdreau ---
I understand that is it requested a feature to add easily a strike over a
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Lib
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32420
Thomas Lendo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||39750
Referenced Bugs:
https://b
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32420
--- Comment #5 from QA Administrators ---
Please read this message in its entirety before responding.
Your bug was confirmed at least 1 year ago and has not had any activity on it
for over a year. Your bug is still set to NEW which means that it
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32420
--- Comment #4 from Frédéric Wang ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> So, the neg solves your problem?
"neg" is to take the negation of a Boolean expression. In LaTeX "\not" strikes
its argument. For example "\not \in" will produce the same as \noti
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32420
--- Comment #3 from Marcos Souza ---
So, the neg solves your problem?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@list
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32420
RGB changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--- Comment #2 from RGB 2011-12-23 16:39:35 P
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32420
Björn Michaelsen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #1 from Björn Mi
