https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://bugs.documentfounda |
|tion.org/sho
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eaglevi...@protonmail.com
--- Co
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|https://openapkfile.co/ |
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173
himan khare changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://openapkfile.co/
--- Comment
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173
--- Comment #54 from Todd ---
I use the Windows version with Wine on Fedora 33. It has a few quirks, but it
is still far more usable than Libre Office. Fixing this bug would go a long
way to getting Libre Office to catch up to Word Pro
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173
--- Comment #53 from rol...@logikalsolutions.com ---
I haven't looked to see if LO has been updated/reported to it yet or not. Just
adding this info here because it was news to me.
OS/2 is back from the grave.
https://www.theregister.com/
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173
--- Comment #52 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to Todd from comment #51)
> (In reply to luciano_f from comment #50)
> > ...
> > https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-dRhyfe1x7fM/WOIXKpGfBDI/JiI/
> > Ae0hxxJx3DsWUWgKVT_88nH-dqdKxiszwCLcB/s1
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173
--- Comment #51 from Todd ---
(In reply to luciano_f from comment #50)
> I am also very interested in this Guides feature that would make LibreOffice
> very powerful and I don’t see it as something so complex to develop because
> it’s just
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173
--- Comment #50 from luciano_f ---
I am also very interested in this Guides feature that would make LibreOffice
very powerful and I don’t see it as something so complex to develop because
it’s just Layout.
Even OnyOffice already has this
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173
--- Comment #49 from rol...@logikalsolutions.com ---
For a more in-depth explanation of Division and Sections you can visit a blog I
wrote this weekend actually using WordPro on Windows 10 in a VM.
http://www.logikalsolutions.com/wordpress
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173
--- Comment #48 from Todd ---
Hi All,
John Brassington (jo...@email2.me) ask me if I would add this to the
conversation as he gets echoes from this bug report but can not post to it for
some weird system reason.
"We still cannot mo
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173
--- Comment #47 from rol...@logikalsolutions.com ---
This needs to return to high priority.
It cannot be done in an AGILE hacking on the fly manner. It has to be
architected.
What also __really__ needs to happen is ensure LO has __all__ o
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173
--- Comment #46 from rol...@logikalsolutions.com ---
(In reply to Todd from comment #44)
> (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #43)
> > No question that we have to improve the Navigator, a proposal is here [1].
> > But despite all the sh
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173
--- Comment #45 from rol...@logikalsolutions.com ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #41)
> I don't see the advantage over the Navigator [1] or master documents [2].
> Users who are familiar with one kind of interaction may prefer th
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173
--- Comment #44 from Todd ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #43)
> No question that we have to improve the Navigator, a proposal is here [1].
> But despite all the shortcommings the basic way of dealing with content is
> working w
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173
--- Comment #43 from Heiko Tietze ---
No question that we have to improve the Navigator, a proposal is here [1]. But
despite all the shortcommings the basic way of dealing with content is working
well. From the WYSIWYG point of view I doub
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173
--- Comment #42 from Todd ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #41)
> I don't see the advantage over the Navigator [1] or master documents [2].
> Users who are familiar with one kind of interaction may prefer this but
> there is no r
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|high|medium
CC|libreoff
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|medium |high
--- Comment #40 from Heiko Ti
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173
--- Comment #39 from rol...@logikalsolutions.com ---
While you are at it, purge all of the java code from this product. That's
causing massive issues on multiple platforms. Icky nasty java code and garbage
collection causing real performanc
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173
--- Comment #37 from Todd ---
(In reply to Xisco Faulí from comment #36)
> Changing priority back to 'medium' since the number of duplicates is lower
> than 5
Comments 17, 23, 25, 26, 28, 35 makes six duplicates. Please place the
priorit
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173
--- Comment #38 from rol...@logikalsolutions.com ---
(In reply to Xisco Faulí from comment #36)
> Changing priority back to 'medium' since the number of duplicates is lower
> than 5
Please return to high priority. Allowing duplicates to ro
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173
Xisco Faulí changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|high|medium
--- Comment #36 from Xisco F
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173
--- Comment #35 from V Stuart Foote ---
*** Bug 121809 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-b
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173
--- Comment #34 from rol...@logikalsolutions.com ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #33)
> (In reply to David from comment #29)
> > This bug most definitely is not a duplicate of bug 37134. Bug 37134
> > concerns having each docume
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173
--- Comment #33 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to David from comment #29)
> This bug most definitely is not a duplicate of bug 37134. Bug 37134
> concerns having each document as a tab within a single application window.
> This bug is a
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173
--- Comment #32 from rol...@logikalsolutions.com ---
Please focus on the Lotus SmartSuite 98 version. This was when the product ran
on both Windows and OS/2 and was pretty much the hay day of the software.
Honestly, until I did this search
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173
--- Comment #30 from rol...@logikalsolutions.com ---
David is correct. Under Lotus WordPro a document was its own little file system
contained within a file. Each tab was a document section so you could keep
research notes, outlines, to-do,
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173
David changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|DUPLICATE |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://bugs.documentfounda |
|tion.org/sho
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://bugs.documentfounda |
|tion.org/sho
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173
Roman Kuznetsov <79045_79...@mail.ru> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173
--- Comment #27 from Stian ---
Damn, people have been asking for this since 2003! :-O
I find it very strange this wouldn't be implemented. Especially when the
functionality is implemented in Calc. It seems logical to me that the source
co
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stian.aarskaug@protonmail.c
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173
Adolfo Jayme changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jo...@email2.me
--- Comment #25 fr
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173
Thomas Lendo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||108137
Referenced Bugs:
https://
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173
--- Comment #24 from Alex Thurgood ---
As a former user of Lotus Smartsuite, I can only agree.
Another use case, as illustrated by the duplicate I just flagged, would be the
ability to use the tabs to create tabbed forms for database work.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173
Alex Thurgood changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c.bu...@posteo.jp
--- Comment #23
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|101776 |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugs
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173
Zenaan Harkness changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||z...@freedbms.net
See
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173
Zenaan Harkness changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||101776
See Also|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173
--- Comment #22 from rol...@logikalsolutions.com ---
Created attachment 125298
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=125298&action=edit
Better screen shot of single WordPro document with tabbed divisions and
sections
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173
Adolfo Jayme changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bz.apache.org/ooo/s
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173
--- Comment #21 from rol...@logikalsolutions.com ---
Documents opened as tabs is a _totally_ unrelated animal. You presented a fish
and this bug is talking about a tiger.
Lotus WordPro, and another commercial product currently on the market, had
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173
--- Comment #20 from sasha.libreoff...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 108964
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=108964&action=edit
screenshot of Libreoffice with several document opened as tabs
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173
--- Comment #19 from Todd ---
Dear Libre Office Developers,
Guys! Ignoring this is an absolute DISASTER!
I just found out the hard way that RHEL 7 and its clones are 64 bit only and
that it no longer will run 32 bit Windows apps under Wine, me
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173
Owen Genat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Functionality request for |Tabbed UI (Writer):
|Writ
49 matches
Mail list logo
