https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33899
--- Comment #42 from tommy27 ---
nice fix Lazlo, however I still suggest users to adopt 1//2, 1//4, 1//8
autocorrect syntax (see comment 38) to avoid other autocorrect fractions
collisions such as those in Bug 71974
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33899
László Németh changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33899
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||target:4.4.0
--- Comment #40 from
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33899
--- Comment #39 from Owen Genat ---
(In reply to comment #38)
> the advantage of an autocorrect replacement such as 1//2 --> ½
> is that you will never have autocorrect collision while writing dates (see
> also Bug 71974) and you will not need
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33899
--- Comment #38 from tommy27 ---
the other, maybe more elegant, solution is to modify the autocorrect
replacement for fractions like has been done in the french localization.
in the french locale I see 1//2 --> ½
rather than 1/2 --> ½ like in
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33899
--- Comment #37 from tommy27 ---
@Ian
yes, the "/" acts as a terminator and triggers autocorrect as already explained
in comment 10
it should be kept because if you type words like "balck/white" and you have a
"balck -> black" autocorrect entry
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33899
--- Comment #36 from Ian Goddard ---
(In reply to comment #35)
> I think there's an elegant workaround to avoid autocorrect interferences
> while dealing with dates without removing the existent autocorrect entries
> for fractions.
>
> just open
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33899
--- Comment #35 from tommy27 ---
I think there's an elegant workaround to avoid autocorrect interferences while
dealing with dates without removing the existent autocorrect entries for
fractions.
just open the autocorrect replacement table and e
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33899
Eike Rathke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steedp...@rocketmail.com
--- Comment #34 f
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33899
tommy27 changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||u_lu...@o2.co.uk
--- Comment #33 from tommy27
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33899
--- Comment #32 from Ian Goddard ---
Maybe we should consider test cases & what would be considered acceptable ways
of handling.
Here's a starter:
A spreadsheet describing stock in a warehouse. The columns are (1)product
description, (2)put-awa
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33899
tommy27 changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nem...@numbertext.org
--- Comment #31 from tom
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33899
Björn Michaelsen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|highest |high
--- Comment #30 from Björn Micha
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33899
tommy27 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|3.3.0 release |Inherited From OOo
--- Comment #29 from tommy2
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33899
Eike Rathke changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.freedesktop.or
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33899
Eike Rathke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pmla...@suse.cz
--- Comment #28 from Eike
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33899
--- Comment #27 from Owen Genat ---
In response to comment #8, the workaround (2) suggested is not effective under
GNU/Linux TDF/LOv4.0.3.3. If I change the AutoCorrection Replacement Table
entry "1/2" with "1|2" in order to allow fractions but v
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33899
tommy27 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Regression: Autocorrection |Autocorrection replaces
|rep
18 matches
Mail list logo
