https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37453
Timur changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37453
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37453
Khaled Hosny changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37453
Beluga changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37453
--- Comment #15 from Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com ---
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding **
To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37453
--- Comment #14 from Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com ---
This issue needs a link to, or an attachment of, a sample (legally
redistributable) font of the afflicted type seeing as there aren't any in a
fresh MacOSX install
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37453
--- Comment #11 from dshel...@san.rr.com ---
I see the bug has been altered to only reference Mac OSX and IA32 hardware.
Should I open another bug for the same problem under Linux 32 and 64-bit?
Seems odd to duplicate bugs but I'll be happy to
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37453
--- Comment #12 from dshel...@san.rr.com ---
Thank you, Khaled Hosny! I have verified the problem I see is due to a lack of
.afm files. It doesn't explain why other apps seem to be able to work with
only the .pfm files, though. I will update
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37453
--- Comment #13 from Khaled Hosny khaledho...@eglug.org ---
(In reply to comment #12)
Thank you, Khaled Hosny! I have verified the problem I see is due to a lack
of .afm files. It doesn't explain why other apps seem to be able to work
with
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37453
Khaled Hosny khaledho...@eglug.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37453
Khaled Hosny khaledho...@eglug.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hardware|x86-64 (AMD64) |x86 (IA32)
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37453
dshel...@san.rr.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dshel...@san.rr.com
--- Comment #8
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37453
--- Comment #9 from dshel...@san.rr.com ---
Also, this applies to Type 1 fonts from any source, not just classic Mac.
Several purchased fonts have this issue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37453
Dave Brown d...@archive.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hardware|x86 (IA32) |x86-64 (AMD64)
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37453
emir_s...@msn.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||42082
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37453
--- Comment #6 from Rabendoktor p...@rabendoktor.de 2012-05-09 23:40:17 PDT
---
in OOO 3.3, these fonts positively were recognized and supported...
Thanks for Your efforts to solve this quest!
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37453
Roman Eisele b...@eikota.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tbehr...@suse.com
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37453
--- Comment #5 from Roman Eisele b...@eikota.de 2012-05-09 12:29:21 PDT ---
A kind of “all clear” ('Entwarnung'): I just tested the new Apache OO 3.4 build
for MacOS X, and it does not show the classic Mac PostScript Type 1 fonts
either. If this
18 matches
Mail list logo