https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39670
--- Comment #8 from Roman Eisele 2012-05-08 10:47:17 PDT ---
Hint: For the issue(s) I reported in comment #3 to comment #5, there is now the
new bug 49645.
If you encounter some similar issues with LibreOffice 3.5 (or 3.6), please
don't reopen t
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39670
Roman Eisele changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS/Version|Mac OS X (All) |Linux (All)
--- Comment #7 from Roman Eis
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39670
Christopher M. Penalver changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39670
--- Comment #6 from Christopher M. Penalver
2012-05-08 03:16:00 PDT ---
Roman Eisele, please do not reopen this report. This report is about how a bug
in 3.3 was fixed in the 3.4 branch. However, a regression has occurred between
the 3.4 and 3.5
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39670
--- Comment #5 from Roman Eisele 2012-05-08 03:14:12 PDT ---
If I don't miss anything, the problematic DOCX section (from
/word/document.xml) is:
-alpha, -beta.
I am no DOCX expert, but if I understand Microsoft's horrible file format right
I s
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39670
--- Comment #4 from Roman Eisele 2012-05-08 02:52:47 PDT ---
Created attachment 61208
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=61208
Screenshot of the sample document in LO 3.5.3.2 on MacOS X 10.6.8
--
Configure bugmail: https://bug
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39670
Roman Eisele changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS/Version|Linux (All) |Mac OS X (All)
Status|RESOLVE
