[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 42949] EasyHack: accelerating compile times ...

2011-11-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42949 --- Comment #8 from August Sodora aug...@gmail.com 2011-11-28 19:14:25 PST --- I haven't really had much luck cleaning up some of that output, but I figure it must be possible. In particular, I'm not even sure if I'm just redirecting too many

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 42949] EasyHack: accelerating compile times ...

2011-11-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42949 --- Comment #7 from Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com 2011-11-22 01:41:19 PST --- Wow - this is really good work August ! :-) I suggest that before we push any of this, we should get some sample patch files for review onto the mailing list

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 42949] EasyHack: accelerating compile times ...

2011-11-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42949 --- Comment #4 from Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com 2011-11-21 03:35:02 PST --- Hi August; it'd be cool to run include-what-you-use over LibO; the clang bootstrapping problem is amusing :-) I wonder which compiler is wrong. Thanks for

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 42949] EasyHack: accelerating compile times ...

2011-11-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42949 --- Comment #5 from August Sodora aug...@gmail.com 2011-11-21 11:51:46 PST --- I was able to successfully build LLVM+Clang by making sure that I had compat headers installed for libstdc++ and issuing the configure on llvm like this:

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 42949] EasyHack: accelerating compile times ...

2011-11-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42949 --- Comment #6 from August Sodora aug...@gmail.com 2011-11-21 13:13:39 PST --- Steps to build clang: * Ensure that the appropriate compat c++ libraries are installed for your system. Typically this means gcc 3.*. For fedora the package is

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 42949] EasyHack: accelerating compile times ...

2011-11-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42949 --- Comment #3 from August Sodora aug...@gmail.com 2011-11-19 18:34:25 PST --- The one that looks the most promising to me is http://code.google.com/p/include-what-you-use/ but I am having difficulty getting clang to build with the latest gcc.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 42949] EasyHack: accelerating compile times ...

2011-11-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42949 --- Comment #1 from Björn Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com 2011-11-18 03:31:20 PST --- Presumably there some headers also included without being used at all in the cxx (e.g. by splitting a cxx file or other quick refactor work). One

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 42949] EasyHack: accelerating compile times ...

2011-11-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42949 --- Comment #2 from Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com 2011-11-18 07:40:00 PST --- IIRC, there is an 'Include what you need' tool somewhere that would be complementary (or perhaps better) than the suggestion below I think. -- Configure

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 42949] EasyHack: accelerating compile times ...

2011-11-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42949 Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Status