https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44498
--- Comment #26 from vulc...@gmx.com 2012-07-23 20:40:49 PDT ---
I confirm.
Resolved in MS Office 2013
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the as
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44498
--- Comment #25 from Fitoschido 2012-07-21 23:36:28 UTC
---
FWIW, MS Office 2013 (currently in beta) can open and edit ODF 1.2 files.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mai
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44498
Eike Rathke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sebast...@sspaeth.de
--- Comment #24 from
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44498
--- Comment #23 from sebast...@sspaeth.de 2012-06-03
03:08:11 PDT ---
I know this is not appropriate for a bug report. But... is there further
information of what specific data loss can occur between odf 1.2 and odf 1.1? I
am tempted to save doc
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44498
--- Comment #22 from vulc...@gmx.com 2012-01-15 13:18:25 PST ---
Someone have send a mail to MS ?
I think if it will be better if it's an official people who send this mail and
no a simple user.
And a copy of this mail in this post could be a goo
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44498
--- Comment #21 from Michael Meeks 2012-01-13
07:22:42 PST ---
Here is the relevant ESC minute from our discussion yesterday:
* all docs created by LibO 3.4+ considered invalid by MS Office
+ we do the right thing: putting 1.2 in the ma
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44498
--- Comment #20 from Michael Stahl 2012-01-12 02:46:14 PST
---
the fact that OOo up to version 3.3 did not write the
manifest:version attribute was a bug:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=115789
the next release (as Apache OpenOff
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44498
--- Comment #19 from Jacek 2012-01-11 23:35:54 PST ---
This is a real LibOffice problem for me. I did some tests with writer from
latest OOo release using three proposed ODF formats (1.0/1.1, 1.2, 1.2
extended). All saved documents are opened by
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44498
tester8 changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iamtest...@gmail.com
--- Comment #18 from test
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44498
Michael Stahl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bu
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44498
Michael Stahl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44498
--- Comment #16 from William Gathoye 2012-01-09 07:23:21
PST ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> can somebody please test which of the 4 document i just attached are
> considered
> invalid by MS Office?
Well done for the idea of these tests :P
On
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44498
--- Comment #15 from William Gathoye 2012-01-09 07:22:01
PST ---
Created attachment 55334
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=55334
Untouched new ODT document created directly with Word 2010
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44498
--- Comment #14 from Michael Stahl 2012-01-09 06:22:09 PST
---
can somebody please test which of the 4 document i just attached are considered
invalid by MS Office?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
---
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44498
--- Comment #13 from Michael Stahl 2012-01-09 06:21:00 PST
---
Created attachment 55331
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=55331
same as previous, but add the manifest:version="1.2" attribute
only change is that this adds the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44498
--- Comment #12 from Michael Stahl 2012-01-09 06:19:05 PST
---
Created attachment 55330
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=55330
same as previous, but removed the text:outline-style element
this removes un-necessary text:outli
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44498
--- Comment #11 from Michael Stahl 2012-01-09 06:17:26 PST
---
Created attachment 55329
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=55329
test1.1, but changed all office:version from 1.1 to 1.2
this does not validate as ODF 1.2
--
Co
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44498
--- Comment #10 from Michael Stahl 2012-01-09 06:14:38 PST
---
Created attachment 55328
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=55328
trivial test doc from LO master, ODF 1.1
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/user
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44498
--- Comment #9 from Michael Stahl 2012-01-09 05:21:01 UTC
---
i just found that the ODF 1.1 schema has a bug:
there are several attributes in the 3.1.18 Document Statistics that are missing
the meta: namespace prefix; this causes ODF 1.1 strict
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44498
--- Comment #8 from Michael Stahl 2012-01-09 04:07:20 PST
---
the ODF Toolkit validator is now an Apache project:
http://incubator.apache.org/odftoolkit/conformance/ODFValidator.html
but the web service on the ODF Toolkit site doesn't seem to w
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44498
--- Comment #7 from Petr Mladek 2012-01-09 03:06:32 PST ---
The missing borders is a particular import/export problem. Please, open
separate issue for this. I wonder if it has been solved last week as the bug
44322 and the bug 43862.
--
Configu
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44498
--- Comment #6 from Petr Mladek 2012-01-09 03:02:42 PST ---
The .odt document is a zip archive. You might uncompress it. You might try to
add the extension .zip instead of .odt. Or open it using an unzip application.
Then you could check the incl
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44498
--- Comment #5 from William Gathoye 2012-01-07 04:19:56
PST ---
I've tried to change the ODF version. My conslusions are:
- 1.2 (non-extended) : non-managed by MSO 2010 (document still considered as
invalid).
- used 1.0, 1.1 format option : MSO
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44498
--- Comment #4 from Michael Stahl 2012-01-06 06:35:58 PST
---
oh, forgot to mention that the ODF Toolkit validator says the attached
hello.odt is valid ODF 1.2.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
---
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44498
--- Comment #3 from Michael Stahl 2012-01-06 06:33:58 PST
---
i'm not sure this is an OOo/LO problem:
AFAIK MS Office only supports ODF 1.1, while OOo/LO write ODF 1.2 extended by
default.
i don't have any MS Office around, can somebody check
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44498
Petr Mladek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44498
--- Comment #2 from Petr Mladek 2012-01-06 06:05:33 PST ---
It would affect many users => added to most annoying bugs.
William, it would be great if you could attach your more complex document with
the borders and tables that is considered wrong
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44498
Petr Mladek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||37361
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44498
--- Comment #1 from Petr Mladek 2012-01-06 05:56:12 PST ---
Created attachment 55214
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=55214
simple test document created by LO-3.5.0-beta2 that is considered as invalid by
MS Office 2010
I open
29 matches
Mail list logo