https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48312
Michael Stahl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #59497|application/octet-stream|application/vnd.oasis.opend
mim
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48312
Foss changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48312
--- Comment #27 from Joel Madero ---
Unfortunately it cannot as FDO is not our infra. Best bet is to upload it to a
third party (maybe google docs or some other such service) and link it here
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48312
--- Comment #26 from r...@alum.mit.edu ---
No luck attaching it. Can the attachment size limit be raised? Scalability
problems are hard to reproduce if it's not possible to add large files.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the a
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48312
--- Comment #25 from r...@alum.mit.edu ---
The spreadsheet by now is quite a bit bigger (about 10 MB). I will try to
attach it. It takes several seconds (i7-920XM, 16 GB RAM) to input more data.
One thing I have determined is that use of condit
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48312
--- Comment #24 from Zeki Bildirici ---
Can you reproduce it with the most recent version 4.1.1.?
On Windows/portable versions data was entered instantly. Will try on my Linux
machine in the weekend. (writing to notify as 5 months passed)
Hope
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48312
Michael Meeks changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|regression |
--- Comment #23 from Michael Meeks ---
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48312
--- Comment #22 from Markus Mohrhard ---
Can we remove the regression keyword?
It seems it is now only a normal bug.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libr
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48312
--- Comment #21 from r...@alum.mit.edu ---
It's significantly faster. Not as fast as I remember 3.4.5, but the
spreadsheet has grown since then. With autocalculate turned on, the delay is
maybe 3-5 seconds; with it turned off, it's still 1-2 sec
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48312
--- Comment #20 from Eike Rathke ---
@rlk:
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/libreoffice-4-0/Linux-x86_64_11-Release-Configuration/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48312
--- Comment #19 from r...@alum.mit.edu ---
Where do I get a 4.0 build (Linux x86-64)?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreof
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48312
--- Comment #18 from Michael Meeks ---
I guess OFFSET can't be calculated idly since it affects dependencies
dramatically; so in fixing the previous bug around not re-computing them we got
a perf. regression - it persists in 4.0. We need a faster
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48312
Michael Stahl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|perf regression |perf target:4.0.0
|tar
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48312
--- Comment #16 from r...@alum.mit.edu ---
Splitting into two rows won't be feasible for this purpose -- the rows here
need to track the rows on the first sheet of the spreadsheet. And there are a
lot more uses of offset where the assumed orderin
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48312
--- Comment #15 from Eike Rathke ---
Apparently the change
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=b66fb4c3c5c7d1bb6543d84d425b6c4bd654fae3
to fix https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=115009 introduced this.
--
You are
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48312
--- Comment #14 from Joel Madero ---
But did something change to make it so much slower? I mean we can say that
there is a more efficient way to do the same tasks but it still doesn't really
answer why there has been a regression for performance
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48312
Eike Rathke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||er...@redhat.com
--- Comment #13 from Eike
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48312
--- Comment #12 from Joel Madero ---
right when I feel like I have figured out fdo a bit ;) Thanks bfoman, another
good thing to learn.
Now the question for me is, is there a way for me to pull this data for all
bugs? That would be quite useful
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48312
--- Comment #11 from bfoman ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> who added perf to whiteboard status? I've never seen that status and want to
> make sure that we're following LibO guidelines.
You can always check that viewing bug history (available ne
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48312
--- Comment #10 from Joel Madero ---
Should have looked first ;) Thanks Markus for clarification, now I have another
term I can add to the list that I look out for.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48312
--- Comment #9 from Markus Mohrhard ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> who added perf to whiteboard status? I've never seen that status and want to
> make sure that we're following LibO guidelines.
Most likely it was Kohei or me. At least in calc it
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48312
--- Comment #8 from Joel Madero ---
who added perf to whiteboard status? I've never seen that status and want to
make sure that we're following LibO guidelines.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48312
--- Comment #7 from r...@alum.mit.edu ---
Note that even if automatic recalculation is turned off there's still a delay.
(With other stuff I've since added to the spreadsheet, the delay has grown
considerably longer, but I don't think it will all
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48312
Joel Madero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Whiteboard|perf
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48312
bfoman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bfo.bugm...@spamgourmet.com
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48312
Kohei Yoshida changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status Whiteboard||perf
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48312
--- Comment #4 from r...@alum.mit.edu 2012-05-30 11:21:35 UTC ---
Created attachment 62296
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=62296
Spreadsheet demonstrating much better performance (enter a number at 'All
Results'.A746)
This sp
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48312
--- Comment #3 from r...@alum.mit.edu 2012-05-24 12:32:36 PDT ---
Note that even applying a background color to a single cell that nothing
depends upon is slow.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- Y
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48312
--- Comment #2 from r...@alum.mit.edu 2012-05-24 09:22:08 UTC ---
Issue still present with 3.5.3.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assigne
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48312
--- Comment #1 from r...@alum.mit.edu 2012-04-04 17:39:54 UTC ---
Created attachment 59497
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=59497
Spreadsheet demonstrating performance regression (enter a number at 'All
Results'.A746)
--
Conf
30 matches
Mail list logo
