https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
Michael Meeks changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|53473 |
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
tommy27 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
--- Comment #44 from rob...@familiegrosskopf.de ---
(In reply to comment #43)
> @Robert
> I have an old WinXP 32bit machine (2006) where I could test and record
> performance. however I'm not very familiar with Base...
>
> could please tell me st
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
--- Comment #43 from tommy27 ---
@Robert
I have an old WinXP 32bit machine (2006) where I could test and record
performance. however I'm not very familiar with Base...
could please tell me step-by-step instructions how to load and browse that
da
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
--- Comment #42 from rob...@familiegrosskopf.de ---
(In reply to comment #41)
>
> nice test, robert. what about current 4.1.1.2 release?
> can you reproduce test on the same machine and see if the performance is
> improved or not?
Have just tes
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
tommy27 changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ba...@quipo.it
--- Comment #41 from tommy27 -
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
--- Comment #40 from rob...@familiegrosskopf.de ---
Here is a new test, asked for in
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51239.
I have started the example-database "Timbabase" with 3 rows in four
different LO-versions an Linux 32bit r
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
--- Comment #39 from Lionel Elie Mamane ---
(In reply to comment #37)
> The cause of this issue was recently analysed. See bug 5 comment 3 and
> follow-ups.
No, what is discussed there is bug 51976. This bug is supposed to be about
another s
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
Joel Madero changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jmadero@gmail.com
Blocks|3
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
--- Comment #37 from Fred Toussi ---
The cause of this issue was recently analysed. See bug 5 comment 3 and
follow-ups.
In summary, navigation on large tables is slow with the embedded HSQLDB
(version 1.8.0) but much faster with the external
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
--- Comment #36 from fred ---
OK. With embedded config, the time taken is 50 seconds. Looks like problem not
solved on the Mac platform after all.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
--- Comment #35 from rob...@familiegrosskopf.de ---
(In reply to comment #34)
> Using LO Version 4.0.0.3 with the test table (DB name: 'timbabase') of
> 30,000+ rows, and connecting as a 'split' DB under HSQLDB v.2.2.8, the time
> to move to the l
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
--- Comment #34 from fred ---
Using LO Version 4.0.0.3 with the test table (DB name: 'timbabase') of 30,000+
rows, and connecting as a 'split' DB under HSQLDB v.2.2.8, the time to move to
the last record is about 8 seconds! So the problem looks l
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
--- Comment #33 from rob...@familiegrosskopf.de ---
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=72523 is too small to show the
slow browsing through the table. I have just tested again with timbabase.odb
(https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
--- Comment #32 from rob...@familiegrosskopf.de ---
Where do you get this new version. When I have had a look at
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/libreoffice-4-0/Linux-x86_10-Release-Configuration/
the newest version is from 29.12.2012
- an
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
--- Comment #31 from Lionel Elie Mamane ---
(In reply to comment #29)
> just by the way. one thing came up while testing with forms:
> setting the list length within the preload-trigger did not work (within LO
> 4):
> Sub PreOpenList( event
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
--- Comment #30 from Julien Nabet ---
Reto: about what's a mimetype see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_media_type
I know what odb and other odf files are in fact zip but if you attach odb, it's
better to put mimetype of odb.
On pc Debian
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
--- Comment #29 from Reto Diener ---
Thanks for the quick answers and the link!
Meantime I have tested with the prerelease LO 4 beta 2 (Windows)
Indeed, the bug seems (almost) gone!
Loading AND scrolling to last record now runs quite fast. both
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
Julien Nabet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #72523|application/x-zip-compresse |application/vnd.oasis.opend
mime
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
--- Comment #27 from rob...@familiegrosskopf.de ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> please repeat the testing with libreoffice 4 beta 2:
> https://www.libreoffice.org/download/pre-releases/
>
> I had the same problem and in that version something has
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
--- Comment #26 from pasqual milvaques ---
please repeat the testing with libreoffice 4 beta 2:
https://www.libreoffice.org/download/pre-releases/
I had the same problem and in that version something has changed that made it
work. I hope that th
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
--- Comment #25 from Reto Diener ---
It seems I have precisely the same problem within my environment:
LibreOffice 3.6.4.3 on Windows XP (Intel Core i3, 2.5GHz, 4GB Memory)
I tested with several version of Java6 RT 6.06, 6.022, 6.038 (latest). N
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
--- Comment #24 from Reto Diener ---
Created attachment 72523
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=72523&action=edit
Small database (hsqldb) with one table to show performance degradation
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
--- Comment #23 from fred ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> And moving to the last row of the repro file (30,849 rows) using Apache OO
> 3.4.1 (on Mac OS X.6) takes 4 secs (if that is relevant). It takes about 1
> min 58 secs under LO Version 3.6.4
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
--- Comment #22 from rob...@familiegrosskopf.de ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> And moving to the last row of the repro file (30,849 rows) using Apache OO
> 3.4.1 (on Mac OS X.6) takes 4 secs (if that is relevant). It takes about 1
> min 58 secs u
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
--- Comment #21 from fred ---
And moving to the last row of the repro file (30,849 rows) using Apache OO
3.4.1 (on Mac OS X.6) takes 4 secs (if that is relevant). It takes about 1 min
58 secs under LO Version 3.6.4.3 (Build ID: 2ef5aff) on the sa
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
--- Comment #20 from rob...@familiegrosskopf.de ---
I have tested now with LO 4.0.0.0 beta from 2012/12/15
Time to browse to the end of the table with over 3 rows is now 1:20
minutes. Much better than nearly 6:00 minutes I have tested for LO 3
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
--- Comment #19 from Alex Thurgood ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> Tested also on Mint 13 KDE 32bit :
>
> JDK 1.6.024
>
> Time to completion : 2 min 28 secs
>
> then with JDK 1.7 :
>
> Time to completion : 1.7.09
>
> so at least on my 32bit
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
--- Comment #18 from Alex Thurgood ---
Tested also on Mint 13 KDE 32bit :
JDK 1.6.024
Time to completion : 2 min 28 secs
then with JDK 1.7 :
Time to completion : 1.7.09
so at least on my 32bit builds, this is much better :-)
Alex
--
You
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
--- Comment #17 from Alex Thurgood ---
Tested with :
Version 4.1.0.0.alpha0+ (Build ID: 7f78980ea260999c88878e362a4d6948d41ddbd)
Pear Linux 32bit
JDK 1.6-024
Time to completion : ca. 2.5 - 3 minutes
Alex
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
--- Comment #16 from Lionel Elie Mamane ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> On my ubuntu-natty (11.04) 32-bit,
> I timed how long it took to move to the last row of attachment 63257
> [details]
> in two local builds from master:
> (*) commit bd9c451
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
--- Comment #15 from Lionel Elie Mamane ---
The Java installation to use can be chosen from within LibreOffice:
Menu Tools / Options / LibreOffice / Java
Choose one, click "OK", you'll have to restart LibreOffice for it to be taken
into accoun
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
--- Comment #14 from Terrence Enger ---
Thank you, Julien. That reminds that the build told me what version
of java it is using...
checking whether to build with Java support... yes
checking for java... /usr/bin/java
checking the ins
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
--- Comment #13 from Julien Nabet ---
Terrence:
I don't know how to force LO to use a specific javac during building or java
during running but "update-alternatives" command may help you.
In brief, you can choose which javac and java to use, in
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
Terrence Enger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lo_b...@iseries-guru.com
--- Comment #1
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
--- Comment #11 from Lionel Elie Mamane ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> I opened the Timbabase.odb file on a 32bit Linux master build :
> Double-clicked to load the table, 4-5 seconds to load the table and display.
> Clicked on the "Go to last r
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
--- Comment #10 from Alex Thurgood ---
However, with :
64bit build
Version 4.1.0.0.alpha0+ (Build ID: abb1e3352b21d26e2ea00f504162540daa7d69f)
on 64bit Bodhi Linux 2.0 and
java version "1.7.0_09"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_0
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
--- Comment #9 from Alex Thurgood ---
Also tested with :
JRE version: 7.0_09-b30
# Java VM: OpenJDK Client VM (23.2-b09 mixed mode, sharing linux-x86 )
I waited this time (coffee break) :
Time to completion : 13 minutes and 30 seconds.
:-/
A
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
--- Comment #8 from Alex Thurgood ---
Additional info :
JRE version: 6.0_24-b24
# Java VM: OpenJDK Client VM (20.0-b12 mixed mode, sharing linux-x86 )
# Derivative: IcedTea6 1.11.5
# Distribution: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS, package 6b24-1.11.5-0ubuntu1~1
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
--- Comment #7 from Alex Thurgood ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Need new tests with libreoffice 4.0.beta2 or later.
>
> Or with a libreoffice-4-0 or master (4.1.alpha) daily build from *after*
> today.
>
> It should be faster, but is it still
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
Lionel Elie Mamane changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #6 from Lionel
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
Lionel Elie Mamane changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.freedesktop.or
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
Bug 52170 depends on bug 53281, which changed state.
Bug 53281 Summary: A double-plus-more extremely slow search/browse table in
embedded HSQLDB since 3.5.5/3.6.0.beta
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53281
What|Remov
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
Lionel Elie Mamane changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||hfmuc2012
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
Lionel Elie Mamane changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||53473
--
Configure bugmail: https:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
Jochen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
Lionel Elie Mamane changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||53281
--
Configure bugmail: https:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
Bug 52170 depends on bug 51239, which changed state.
Bug 51239 Summary: A double-plus-more extremely slow search/browse table in
embedded HSQLDB since 3.5.5/3.6.0.beta
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51239
What|Old V
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
--- Comment #5 from rob...@familiegrosskopf.de 2012-07-21 10:52:11 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Hmm... we need a test comparing 3.3.x with JRE 1.6.22 and 3.5.4 with JRE
> 1.6.24
> or older.
Here with JRE 1.6.22, LO 3.3.4 and OpenSuSE 32-
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
--- Comment #4 from Alex Thurgood 2012-07-20 19:43:30 PDT
---
(In reply to comment #3)
> 3.5.5 final: 120s
> 3.5.4 rc2 (=final): 120s
>
>
> Hmm... we need a test comparing 3.3.x with JRE 1.6.22 and 3.5.4 with JRE
> 1.6.24
> or older. My "slow
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
--- Comment #3 from Lionel Elie Mamane 2012-07-18 08:56:17
PDT ---
3.5.5 final: 120s
3.5.4 rc2 (=final): 120s
Hmm... we need a test comparing 3.3.x with JRE 1.6.22 and 3.5.4 with JRE 1.6.24
or older. My "slower on dev tree" thing is probably b
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
--- Comment #2 from Lionel Elie Mamane 2012-07-18 08:36:40
PDT ---
3.5.5.rc1 (official packages): 130s
LibreOffice 3.3.4: 300s with OpenJDK 6b24-1.11.1-6, but that's probably because
of bug 35023
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
--- Comment #1 from Lionel Elie Mamane 2012-07-18 08:22:51
PDT ---
So, in my development tree, *after* bug 51239 is fixed, it takes more than 350
seconds to move to the last row of the table.
reproduction file: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/atta
53 matches
Mail list logo
