https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58995
DavidO changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |d.ostrov...@gmx.de
|desktop.o
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58995
--- Comment #40 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to comment #33)
> Can you confirm, that the original problem solved? Steps to reproduce:
>
Yes, that frame panel is now responding in JavaFerret-32
>
> We can possible have another problem(s)
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58995
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|target:4.2.0 target:4.1.0.2 |target:4.2.0 target:4.1.0.2
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58995
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|target:4.2.0|target:4.2.0 target:4.1.0.2
--- Co
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58995
--- Comment #37 from Michael Meeks ---
Cool - I'm just a dofus - I was reading the diff in the comment as the real
diff ;-) will approve the gerrit changes - thanks ! :-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58995
--- Comment #36 from DavidO ---
(In reply to comment #35)
> Fix looks lovely David - thanks so much for that ! :-) Assuming that code
> was once useful for JDK 1.6 (?) could we make removing that branch JDK
> version specific ? :-) It'd be a sham
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58995
--- Comment #35 from Michael Meeks ---
Fix looks lovely David - thanks so much for that ! :-) Assuming that code was
once useful for JDK 1.6 (?) could we make removing that branch JDK version
specific ? :-) It'd be a shame to bust the otherwise w
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58995
--- Comment #34 from DavidO ---
Complete steps how to reproduce the original problem:
1. install Windows 7 64 bit
2. install JRE1.7u25 32 bit (or JDK)
3. activate JRE AT support with C:\Program Files (x86)\Java\jre7\\bin\jabswitch
-enabled
4. in
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58995
--- Comment #33 from DavidO ---
(In reply to comment #32)
> @David,
>
> Something is not quite correct yet. Pulled tonight's daily with your patch,
> and installed JRE 1.7u25 and activated JAB with jabswitch -enabled.
>
> Build Info
> tinderbox
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58995
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58995
DavidO changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58995
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||target:4.2.0
--- Comment #31 from
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58995
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||archeo...@gmail.com
See Also|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58995
--- Comment #29 from DavidO ---
(In reply to comment #28)
> I guess the advice I got from the Java / a11y team was to stick with 1.6 for
> now, and that there may be some security related meta-issue around event
> emission that was fixed in 1.7 t
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58995
--- Comment #28 from Michael Meeks ---
I guess the advice I got from the Java / a11y team was to stick with 1.6 for
now, and that there may be some security related meta-issue around event
emission that was fixed in 1.7 that makes this hard to fi
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58995
--- Comment #27 from James Teh ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> Are there other known/reported use cases or applications with
> not working JAB 2.0.3 included in JDK 1.7?
Unfortunately, none that have been reported to us.
--
You are receiving th
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58995
--- Comment #26 from DavidO ---
so building with JDK 1.7, i can reproduce the problem with LO 4.2.0 alpha
(unchanged master from 2013-06-24) => JAB 2.0.3, JDK 1.7u25 and can confirm
that switching back to JDK 1.6u45, JAB 2.0.2 solves the proble
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58995
--- Comment #25 from V Stuart Foote ---
Frequently end up installing and uninstalling the v2.0.2 JAB and JRE 1.6u45,
when needing to work JRE 1.7
However, work around is to not move the WindowsAccessBridge32.dll or the java
executables into the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58995
--- Comment #24 from DavidO ---
How are you managing to switch from JAB 2.0.2 to JAB 2.0.3 on the same machine
back and forth?
I've found that question (without an answer ;-)
https://forums.oracle.com/thread/2513951
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58995
--- Comment #23 from V Stuart Foote ---
Created attachment 81351
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=81351&action=edit
Source for Java Access Bridge v2.0.2 from Oracle distribution of
accessbridge-2_0_2-fcs-bin-b06.zip
@David,
(
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58995
--- Comment #22 from DavidO ---
@Stuart thank you for that description!
i can reproduce that it works with SwingSet2.jar (i closed the NVDA bug) and
not with Close Writer without saving Dialog. There i do not get any focus
lost/gain events on ta
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58995
--- Comment #21 from V Stuart Foote ---
@David,
(In reply to comment #19)
> Please can we first try to find the answer to that question:
>
> why i am not getting focus lost/gain events in SwingSet2.jar with
> JDK 1.7.0_25 (with included 2.0.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58995
--- Comment #20 from DavidO ---
filled a ticket vor NVDA project:
http://community.nvda-project.org/ticket/3303#ticket
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Li
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58995
--- Comment #19 from DavidO ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> SwingSet2.jar works correctly for me with NVDA 2013.1 following the steps
> you provided in comment 12.
Which JAB version are you using?
> I'm not sure why it doesn't work for you. Di
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58995
--- Comment #18 from James Teh ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> Although the latest NVDA 2013.1
> build is throwing some JABHandler.pyo gain_Focus errors that are new to me.
> -- Jamie?
I'm not seeing this for the SwingSet2 example. It's off-topic
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58995
--- Comment #17 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> location--C:\Program Files (x86)\java\jre6
>
> Append ";%JRE_HOME\bin" to the Windows system PATH
>
missing "%" sign on variable... should be
Append ";%JRE_HOME%\bin" to the W
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58995
--- Comment #16 from V Stuart Foote ---
The most efficient way to set up the JRE 1.6u45 with Java Access Bridge is to
download and install the 32-bit JRE
Then set a JRE_HOME system variable, pointing to the install
location--C:\Program Files (x8
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58995
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|NOTOURBUG
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58995
--- Comment #14 from James Teh ---
SwingSet2.jar works correctly for me with NVDA 2013.1 following the steps you
provided in comment 12. I'm not sure why it doesn't work for you. Did you have
the JAB enabled correctly? (It is included, but not en
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58995
DavidO changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58995
--- Comment #13 from DavidO ---
New use case 1:
the same as in c12, but with JAWS 14.0 and not with NVDA:
As suggested in
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/technotes/guides/access/enable_and_test.html
under the section:
Testing Java Access
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58995
--- Comment #12 from DavidO ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Apparent changes in Java SE JRE 1.7 are impacting fidelity of Java Access
> Bridge (JAB) v2.0.3 delivered UNO Accessibility API roles for AT users on
> Windows OS.
>
> Simple test case:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58995
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d.ostrov...@gmx.de,
|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58995
--- Comment #10 from V Stuart Foote ---
Here is a thought, do we need to shift the build system's JDK forward to a
1.7.0_xx build and generate J2SE 7 bytecode to get the UAA <--> JAB v2.0.3
working correctly?
Through the 4.1.0.1 build we push on
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58995
--- Comment #9 from James Teh ---
I mentioned this to a contact at Oracle, but there are no guarantees that this
will have any effect.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58995
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ACCESSIBILITY: [a11y] |ACCESSIBILITY: [a11y] Java
36 matches
Mail list logo
