https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #82 from Ruslan Kabatsayev ---
(In reply to Franck Larrivé from comment #81)
> every time I publish the comment by "submit" I get a "504 gateway time-out"
Right, I also get it. But it seems to only be related to downloading of
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #81 from Franck Larrivé ---
(In reply to Ruslan Kabatsayev from comment #79)
> (In reply to Franck Larrivé from comment #78)
> > Comment on attachment 130448 [details]
> > vec F & widevec AB
> >
> > still KO for vec & widevec
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #79 from Ruslan Kabatsayev ---
(In reply to Franck Larrivé from comment #78)
> Comment on attachment 130448 [details]
> vec F & widevec AB
>
> still KO for vec & widevec with LO 5.2.4.rc2 on Ubuntu 16.04
Hey, why so many repe
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #79 from Ruslan Kabatsayev ---
(In reply to Franck Larrivé from comment #78)
> Comment on attachment 130448 [details]
> vec F & widevec AB
>
> still KO for vec & widevec with LO 5.2.4.rc2 on Ubuntu 16.04
Hey, why so many repe
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #77 from Franck Larrivé ---
Comment on attachment 130448
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=130448
vec F & widevec AB
still KO for vec & widevec with LO 5.2.4.rc2 on Ubuntu 16.04
--- Comment #78 from
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #76 from Franck Larrivé ---
Comment on attachment 130448
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=130448
vec F & widevec AB
still KO for vec & widevec with LO 5.2.4.rc2 on Ubuntu 16.04
--- Comment #77 from
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #76 from Franck Larrivé ---
Comment on attachment 130448
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=130448
vec F & widevec AB
still KO for vec & widevec with LO 5.2.4.rc2 on Ubuntu 16.04
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #74 from Franck Larrivé ---
Comment on attachment 130448
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=130448
vec F & widevec AB
still KO for vec & widevec with LO 5.2.4.rc2 on Ubuntu 16.04
--- Comment #75 from
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #74 from Franck Larrivé ---
Comment on attachment 130448
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=130448
vec F & widevec AB
still KO for vec & widevec with LO 5.2.4.rc2 on Ubuntu 16.04
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #73 from Franck Larrivé ---
Created attachment 130448
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=130448&action=edit
vec F & widevec AB
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
Jean-Baptiste Faure changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |WORKSFORME
--- Comment #72
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
mehmet337...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resoluti
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #70 from Element Green ---
Still occurring on Ubuntu 16.04 with LibreOffice 5.2.1.2 with vec and widevec.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.__
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
Joel Madero changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rud...@familie-feile.de
--- Comment
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #68 from hete...@gmail.com ---
LibreOffice 5.1.0.3, Windows 7 x64
widevec is shown with the arrow tip proportional to the width of the content,
making it unrecognizable when it is "too large"
http://i.imgur.com/5WDCSWF.png
--
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #67 from Dorange-Pattoret Didier ---
The bug is still here. LO 5.0.4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libr
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
mehmet337...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||drdanie...@gmail.com
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
mehmet337...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
mehmet337...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
Compone
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
Enrique changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #64 from Yury ---
(In reply to Enrique from comment #62)
> Anyway, I think it should be revised what I tested in comment#53: vector
> over F is cropped or not depending of the version used to save the file ...
> and it begins
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
Owen Genat changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #62 from Enrique ---
About Comment#60:
The problem is not with
vec F ^" " = m vec a
but just with
vec F = m vec a
(I can confirm that with previous formula, vector over F is cropped, with last
version Version: 4.4.4.0.0+
B
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #61 from Yury ---
It all depends on combination of fonts (set in formula properties + what goes
as/instead of OpenSymbol) and the metrics of the surrounding text area (formula
frame dimensions).
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #60 from Yury ---
For things like this:
vec F ^" " = m vec a
the working workaround is:
vec F ^{} = m vec a
You may hit other issues when using the ^{}, _{}, and their variations, though
-- like baseline shifting #65229.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #59 from mehmet337...@gmail.com ---
I have the same issue. My os: Linux Mint 17.1 Mate. Libreoffice 4.2.72
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #58 from Enrique ---
Tested again with testfile in comment#53 and Version: 4.4.3.0.0+
Build ID: 8106e522c4ea2ae4441ec571579a38eeb6d9af04
TinderBox: Linux-rpm_deb-x86_64@46-TDF
Result: still not working ok with something so sim
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #57 from Owen Genat ---
According to comment 8 and comment 9 this may be a duplicate of bug 37016.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libr
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
tommy27 changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.freedesktop.or
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #56 from Gaborit Jean-Luc ---
I reproduce this bug on:
LO Version: 4.3.1.2 Build ID: 958349dc3b25111dbca392fbc281a05559ef6848
Windows 7 Edition Familliale Premium Service Pack1
I change Platform: Linux to All
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
Joel Madero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|I reproduce this bug on:|
|Windows 7 Edition
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
Gaborit Jean-Luc changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|I reproduce this bug on:|I reproduce this bug on:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
Gaborit Jean-Luc changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||I reproduce this bug on:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
Gaborit Jean-Luc changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Formula Editor |Libreoffice
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
Gaborit Jean-Luc changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Libreoffice |Formula Editor
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
Gaborit Jean-Luc changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS|Linux (All) |All
CC|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #54 from Enrique ---
Created attachment 98604
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=98604&action=edit
Documents and images about comment #53 tests
Documents and images about comment #53 tests
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #53 from Enrique ---
Tested with
http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/3.3.0.4/deb/x86_64/LibO_3.3.0_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
with ubuntu 14.04 64 bits
Some installation messages
Configurando libr
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #52 from Dorange-Pattoret Didier ---
This issue does not appear on AOO 4.0 and AOO 4.1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailin
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #51 from Joel Madero ---
Can someone check to see if it worked with our earliest release?
http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/
would be nice to know if this is a regression
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #50 from Enrique ---
As title just mentions widehat/widevector, I just want to confirm it also
happens with "vec" in something so simple like that, Newton's second law:
vec F = m vec a
which shows no vector arrow over F
This is impo
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
Jean-Baptiste Faure changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||u.fu...@yahoo.de
--- Comment #49 f
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
Jean-Baptiste Faure changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vv070vv...@yahoo.fr
--- Comment #4
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #47 from Jean-Baptiste Faure ---
Created attachment 94619
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=94619&action=edit
screencopy OK for widehat, KO for widevector
(In reply to comment #44)
> Created attachment 92447 [detai
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #46 from Dorange-Pattoret Didier ---
Created attachment 94613
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=94613&action=edit
With AOOo 4.0.1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #45 from Dorange-Pattoret Didier ---
Created attachment 94612
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=94612&action=edit
With LO
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #44 from Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer ---
Created attachment 92447
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=92447&action=edit
widehat {a + {b + c} over {a}} formula PDF (Linux)
Bug is not present using git master (04a7ac6f0
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #43 from Dorange-Pattoret Didier ---
Hello,
The bug is not present on Libreoffice 4.2 RC 2 running with Mac OS.
So it a real only Linux bug.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #42 from Dorange-Pattoret Didier ---
I downloaded old versions of OpenOffice.org and Ubuntu 13.10
The bug is not present in OOo 3.2.1 but comes with OOo 3.3
I hope it will help you !
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are t
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #41 from Arnaud Versini ---
Perhaps you can download older version of OpenOffice.org to see if it is
inherited
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #40 from Joel Madero ---
Unfortunately there is no older bibisect
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bu
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #39 from Dorange-Pattoret Didier ---
I tried tonight a bisection with this formula widehat {a + {b + c} over {a}}
and the archive http://mirror3.layerjet.com/libreoffice-qa/bibisect-4.0.tar.xz
And the bug is present in the oldest revi
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #38 from Dorange-Pattoret Didier ---
Created attachment 92183
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=92183&action=edit
Win7 and LO 4.2 RC 2
Widehat is right but borderline are crazy
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
Joel Madero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|3.5.0 Beta0 |Inherited From OOo
--- Comment #37 from Jo
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #36 from Dorange-Pattoret Didier ---
Comment on attachment 92181
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=92181
Sorry the last was wrong
It seems that the bug do'nt give the same view or it's not exactly the same bug
?
-
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #35 from Dorange-Pattoret Didier ---
Created attachment 92181
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=92181&action=edit
Sorry the last was wrong
Sorry but the last capture was wrong.
This was made with LO 4.1.3 and Aoo
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #34 from Christophe Devalland ---
(In reply to comment #33)
> Created attachment 92180 [details]
> With LO 4.1.3 and AOOo 4.0.1 (Ubuntu).
Could you try with the same font in AOO ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #33 from Dorange-Pattoret Didier ---
Created attachment 92180
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=92180&action=edit
With LO 4.1.3 and AOOo 4.0.1 (Ubuntu).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #32 from Christophe Devalland ---
@Didier : but this problem occurs in AOO too !
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #31 from Dorange-Pattoret Didier ---
(In reply to comment #29)
> it's a linux bug only, isn't it ?
Yes see my last comments.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #30 from Dorange-Pattoret Didier ---
(In reply to comment #27)
> I agree. It's probably an inherited bug from OOo.
I do'nt.
My bibisection (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=91511)
was made with an LO 4.0 archive
(http:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #29 from Christophe Devalland ---
it's a linux bug only, isn't it ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #28 from Dorange-Pattoret Didier ---
I tried tonight with this exact formula widehat {a + {b + c} over {a}}.
I get the bug with LO 4.1.3.2 under Ubuntu and I do'nt get it with LO 4.2 RC 2
under Win7.
If necessary I could try a new b
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #27 from Christophe Devalland ---
I agree. It's probably an inherited bug from OOo.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing l
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
Joel Madero changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mst...@redhat.com
--- Comment #26 from Joe
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
Joel Madero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|3.6.5.2 release |3.5.0 Beta0
--- Comment #25 from Joel Made
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #24 from Arnaud Versini ---
@Didier, did you use this exact formula ? widehat {a + {b + c} over {a}}
As for me all versions doesn't work correctly, not a regression for me.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assign
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #23 from Arnaud Versini ---
@Didier, I used the oldest version of the bibisect repo and doesn't work for
me, sorry.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
__
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #22 from Arnaud Versini ---
I'm trying to bisect with source bisect.
@Didier , seems for me that commit
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=15af925c254f27046427de70a59011e2ac3d6bdb
have the issue for me. I need to
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #21 from Dorange-Pattoret Didier ---
I agree with this idea : it's only a gnu/linux bug !
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mai
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #19 from William Gathoye ---
Created attachment 91617
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=91617&action=edit
ArchLinux_libo_4.1.4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #20 from William Gathoye ---
Arnaud Versini and me haven't succeeded to reproduce this bug on Windows 8.1
using LibO 3.6.5, 4.0.2 and 4.2 (2014-01-07 7:32:09), and on OS X Moutain Lion
using LibO 4.0.4.
It seems like it is a GNU/Linu
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #18 from William Gathoye ---
Created attachment 91616
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=91616&action=edit
OSX_libo_4.0.4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
__
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #17 from Dorange-Pattoret Didier ---
The bug is always here.
I attached a snapshot of bibisection.
I hope it could help you to fix this bug.
Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #16 from Dorange-Pattoret Didier ---
Created attachment 91512
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=91512&action=edit
Made with LO 4.2 RC1 under OpenMandriva
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assigne
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #15 from Dorange-Pattoret Didier ---
Created attachment 91511
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=91511&action=edit
bibisect log made by ddorange
It was made with the file
http://mirror3.layerjet.com/libreoffice-qa/b
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
Jorendc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||luizl...@gmail.com
--- Comment #14 from Jorend
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #13 from Yury ---
As far as I understand, the problem is caused by renderer not reserving enough
space on top of the glyph. For some font faces this is okay anyway, and for
some faces this produces cropping.
As a workaround of sorts,
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #12 from Yury ---
Created attachment 80122
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=80122&action=edit
Gentium Plus formula "A {tilde A}" with "native" (Gentium Plus) tilde
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #11 from Yury ---
Created attachment 80121
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=80121&action=edit
Gentium Plus formula "A {tilde A}" with Open Symbol tilde
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #10 from Yury ---
Created attachment 80119
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=80119&action=edit
sample doc with comb. diacr.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #9 from Yury ---
> I'm attaching the sample doc, all set in "Gentium Plus", and TWO
> screenshots, rendered (1) with font substitution "Open Symbol->Gentium Plus"
> AND (2) without such substitution.
> The doc contains: (1) plain text
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #8 from Yury ---
Even the simplest use of combining diacritics like {hat A} or {tilde A} *by
means of formula editor "catalog"* might go wrong.
The BIG problem is glyphs accessed via "catalog" (tilde, hat etc.) are taken
from the "Op
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
Jorendc changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.0.1.2 release |3.6.5.2 release
--- Comment #7 from Jorendc -
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
Jorendc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burhanbara...@gmail.com
--- Comment #6 from Jo
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
Jorendc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||b7.10110...@gmail.com
--- Comment #5 from Jore
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
Jorendc changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Formula objects with|Formula objects with
|wideha
87 matches
Mail list logo
