https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63087
Denis Sorotnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|sorot...@gmail.com |libreoffice-b...@lists.free
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63087
Denis Sorotnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |sorot...@gmail.com
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63087
--- Comment #43 from bunkem ---
Thanks everyone for your comments. In particular, thank you @ady. That was a
good example use case. It is not usual for me to have 10+ sheets in a
financial model.
Yes it is a critical missing function to
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63087
--- Comment #42 from ady ---
I'd like to present a simplified case demonstrating the need for this feature.
A colleague has maintained a (Calc's) workbook file with multiple worksheets
for some time. He retired (and we have no contact any
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63087
Hossein changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||reviewed:2022
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63087
Mike Kaganski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||difficultyInteresting,
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63087
m.a.riosv changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikekagan...@hotmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63087
--- Comment #39 from Martin Patsov ---
(In reply to documentfoundation1 from comment #38)
> I wouldn't say it's a bug, but a missing feature - an important one, if you
> use complex spreadsheets...
>
> Here is a workaround:
>
> Just copy
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63087
--- Comment #38 from documentfoundati...@byom.de ---
I wouldn't say it's a bug, but a missing feature - an important one, if you use
complex spreadsheets...
Here is a workaround:
Just copy/paste the cell reference of the cell you wish to
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63087
--- Comment #37 from Timi Agama ---
I'd suggest that the following changes to the UX would solve this problem:
1. When user traces a dependent/precedent that's on another worksheet the blue
square is shown, just as it is now.
2. If user h
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63087
--- Comment #36 from George Theodoridis ---
Hi,
I have an office of 20+ people.
I want to move from Excel to Calc.
An inability to trace between sheets is a deal breaker.
It is essential to be able to validate the construction of spreadshe
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63087
--- Comment #35 from Steve Cahill ---
Re the work-around offered in comment #34: yes, good for tracing dependents in
other sheets, though it might be too labor-intensive for some. The work-around,
while useful for tracing dependents, leave
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63087
gte.ejecut...@ecosa.com.co changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gte.ejecut...@ecosa.co
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63087
--- Comment #33 from Richard Venelbo Nielsen ---
+1 for this one as well. This is keeping me from making anything more than
simple workbooks in Calc.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.__
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63087
Julien Nabet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||er...@redhat.com
Severit
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63087
Julien Nabet changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63087
--- Comment #31 from Will Braswell ---
+1 this should be listed as CRITICAL because it really is a serious bug!
As noted, this is a carry-over from OpenOffice.org:
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=44828
The bug is also discusse
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63087
--- Comment #30 from Brandon ---
+1 for this being important functionality. Encountered on 6.2.3.2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63087
--- Comment #29 from Barry McMullin ---
Given early discussion on priority of this, I just want to log another +1 that
this does affect me, and does limit my usage/deployment of localc.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63087
Gessel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ges...@blackrosetech.com
--- Comment #28
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63087
bunkem changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bun...@gmail.com
--- Comment #27 from bu
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63087
--- Comment #26 from Andrea Ferrari ---
Issue still present in Libreoffice Calc 6.0.4.2 (x64)
BR
Andrea
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63087
Steve Cahill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||svcah...@aol.com
--- Comment #25 f
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63087
Buovjaga changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||behera.an...@gmail.com
--- Comment #24
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63087
--- Comment #23 from Vitaly <9459...@gmail.com> ---
This missing feature is very important!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63087
--- Comment #22 from Ralf ---
(In reply to QA Administrators from comment #21)
The bug is still present (LibreOffice 5.2.3.3, 32-bit version, Windows 10).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63087
--- Comment #21 from QA Administrators ---
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding **
To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to rete
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63087
--- Comment #20 from s...@keybit.net ---
NOTE: patch is too lame, doesn't work on multiple references either...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libr
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63087
--- Comment #19 from s...@keybit.net ---
Created attachment 120290
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=120290&action=edit
temptative patch
I'm attaching a temptative patch for the problem. It does NOT provide
click-
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63087
--- Comment #18 from s...@keybit.net ---
still present in current master branch
(commit ffde331fbefec360d0f6ca5268cdc9acd1a6440b)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63087
--- Comment #17 from s...@keybit.net ---
Created attachment 120285
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=120285&action=edit
example ods showing the problem
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63087
--- Comment #16 from Ralf ---
(In reply to QA Administrators from comment #15)
The bug is still present without changes (LibreOffice 5.0.3.2, Windows 7).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63087
--- Comment #15 from QA Administrators ---
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding **
To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to rete
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63087
raal changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ahamedck...@yahoo.com
--- Comment #14 from raal
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63087
Jorendc changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|60270 |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63087
--- Comment #13 from Julien Nabet ---
After some research, here's a codepointer:
http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/sc/source/core/tool/detfunc.cxx#InsertArrow
The difference between ok (all in 1 sheet) and ko (the ref in another sheet) is
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63087
--- Comment #12 from Ralf ---
Joel, thank you for clarifying that this bug is not a MAB. Unfortunately, I was
not aware of the flowchart mentioned by you above when I nominated the bug vor
mab4.1. I apologize for unnecessary noise.
If my languag
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63087
--- Comment #11 from Joel Madero ---
Please also don't call bugs "serious show-stoppers" - I know for you it might
be but honestly if you look through the THOUSANDS of bugs you'll see that many
of them call themselves "serious show stoppers". In
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63087
Ralf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|enhancement |normal
--- Comment #10 from Ralf ---
(In reply t
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63087
--- Comment #9 from stealths...@sbcglobal.net ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> I am removing this from the MAB list, the reason for this:
>
> 1. I do not see easy reproducible steps - while the first entry has some
> stuff "once you have defined a
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63087
Julien Nabet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63087
Joel Madero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||60270
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63087
Joel Madero changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jmadero@gmail.com
Blocks|6
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63087
Ralf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||60270
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63087
Ralf changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS|Windows (All) |All
Severity|normal
45 matches
Mail list logo
