[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 68274] provide better update mechanism -- Mozilla ARchive (mar) based incrementals

2016-06-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68274 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jigglebi...@mailinator.com --- C

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 68274] provide better update mechanism -- Mozilla ARchive (mar) based incrementals

2016-06-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68274 --- Comment #33 from V Stuart Foote --- *** Bug 83406 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bu

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 68274] provide better update mechanism -- Mozilla ARchive (mar) based incrementals

2016-10-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68274 --- Comment #34 from Mike Kaganski --- Does the work on MAR-based LO updater for Windows account for the case when LO for Windows is initially installed using MSI (the prevalent majority case, mandatory for enterprise deployment)? I ask b

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 68274] provide better update mechanism -- Mozilla ARchive (mar) based incrementals

2016-11-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68274 --- Comment #35 from Nathan Yee --- (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #34) > Does the work on MAR-based LO updater for Windows account for the case when > LO for Windows is initially installed using MSI (the prevalent majority > case

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 68274] provide better update mechanism -- Mozilla ARchive (mar) based incrementals

2016-11-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68274 --- Comment #36 from Jan Holesovsky --- Unfortunately Sparkle was not cross-platform :-( -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing li

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 68274] provide better update mechanism -- Mozilla ARchive (mar) based incrementals

2016-11-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68274 --- Comment #37 from Sierk Bornemann --- (In reply to Jan Holesovsky from comment #36) > Unfortunately Sparkle was not cross-platform :-( Sparkle for macOS: Sparkle https://sparkle-project.org/ https://github.com/sparkle-project/Sparkle

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 68274] provide better update mechanism -- Mozilla ARchive (mar) based incrementals

2016-11-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68274 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added CC||todven...@suomi24.fi --- Comment #38 f

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 68274] provide better update mechanism -- Mozilla ARchive (mar) based incrementals

2016-11-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68274 --- Comment #39 from Buovjaga --- (In reply to Buovjaga from comment #38) > Markus M. will work on getting the current updater in shape. Let's not get > carried away. There's plenty of LibreOffice work we can direct our energy to > while w

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 68274] provide better update mechanism -- Mozilla ARchive (mar) based incrementals

2016-11-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68274 --- Comment #40 from Adolfo Jayme --- (In reply to Nathan Yee from comment #35) > I would personally recommend scrapping the existing work on the updater and > looking into an alternative framework such as Sparkle. That’s what I’ve been s

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 68274] provide better update mechanism -- Mozilla ARchive (mar) based incrementals

2016-11-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68274 --- Comment #41 from steve -_- --- I strongly support sparkle usage. The counter argument atm from devs is, that sparkle is not cross platform. And then again, snap-builds (whatever that is) on Linux is dealt with and that's not cross from

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 68274] provide better update mechanism -- Mozilla ARchive (mar) based incrementals

2017-01-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68274 --- Comment #42 from Markus Mohrhard --- (In reply to Adolfo Jayme from comment #40) > (In reply to Nathan Yee from comment #35) > > I would personally recommend scrapping the existing work on the updater and > > looking into an alternativ

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 68274] provide better update mechanism -- Mozilla ARchive (mar) based incrementals

2017-01-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68274 --- Comment #43 from Markus Mohrhard --- (In reply to steve -_- from comment #41) > I strongly support sparkle usage. The counter argument atm from devs is, > that sparkle is not cross platform. And then again, snap-builds (whatever > that

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 68274] provide better update mechanism -- Mozilla ARchive (mar) based incrementals

2017-01-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68274 --- Comment #44 from Markus Mohrhard --- And to make sure it is not only a rant but also shows some of the things that any alternative would need to provide: * cross-platform, at least Windows and Linux, OSX is a plus * simple signing of

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 68274] provide better update mechanism -- Mozilla ARchive (mar) based incrementals

2016-05-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68274 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|high|medium Hardware|Other

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 68274] provide better update mechanism -- Mozilla ARchive (mar) based incrementals

2016-05-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68274 --- Comment #28 from steve -_- --- Stuart: this bug was OS X only, since the OP (me) suggested to use Sparkle to deal with updates. The sparkle framework is OS X only. If TDF / LO core devs decide to instead work on the mozilla update mec

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 68274] provide better update mechanism -- Mozilla ARchive (mar) based incrementals

2016-05-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68274 --- Comment #29 from steve -_- --- ups. sorry, OP not me, but I am sure I filed a dupe a long time ago ;) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffic

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 68274] provide better update mechanism -- Mozilla ARchive (mar) based incrementals

2016-05-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68274 --- Comment #30 from V Stuart Foote --- @Steve, looks like it went cross platform from comment 5 onward... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffi

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 68274] provide better update mechanism -- Mozilla ARchive (mar) based incrementals

2016-05-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68274 --- Comment #31 from Sierk Bornemann --- (In reply to steve -_- from comment #28) > The sparkle framework is OS X only. Sparkle OS X: Sparkle https://sparkle-project.org/ https://github.com/sparkle-project/Sparkle Sparkle Windows: WinSpa