https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68566
Eike Rathke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||85490
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68566
Eike Rathke changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://bugs.freedesktop.or |
|g/show_bug.cgi?id=8163
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68566
Alex Thurgood changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||regression
--- Comment #13 from Alex Thu
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68566
Jean-Baptiste Faure changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.freedesktop.or
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68566
--- Comment #23 from Joel Madero ---
Also not reverting the commit . . . removing myself from cc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68566
--- Comment #22 from ign_christian ---
(In reply to Jean-Baptiste Faure from comment #20)
> I asked the ESC to consider the decision to revert this commit for branches
> 4.2 and 4.3.
Hope that reverting commits is possible. Unless we're facing do
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68566
--- Comment #21 from Joel Madero ---
It will not be backported - there is a new string involved - translation and
all that fun stuff. So 4.4 it is.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
__
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68566
--- Comment #20 from Jean-Baptiste Faure ---
(In reply to Joel Madero from comment #18)
> This is literally like asking for a bug to be reintroduced into
> LibreOfficeKohei was nice enough to add an option for users to bring the
> bug back if
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68566
--- Comment #19 from MICKRU ---
Fair enough - I do not understand what the original bug was. It can't be that
the bug is that one feels that its unexpected that referenced cells worked as
in 4.2.6 which was that sorting was updating references. B
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68566
--- Comment #18 from Joel Madero ---
This is literally like asking for a bug to be reintroduced into
LibreOfficeKohei was nice enough to add an option for users to bring the
bug back if they so choose.
Anyways - feel free to download a daily
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68566
--- Comment #17 from MICKRU ---
Too bad that I need this for my work...
I tend to agree to some other guy saying that this basic functionality (not
updating references) should not have been introduced in the first place on the
otherwise wonderful
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68566
Alex Thurgood changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68566
--- Comment #15 from Alex Thurgood ---
(In reply to ign_christian from comment #14)
> Looks similar with Bug 84055 which is marked as not a bug. New sorting
> behavior since 4.3.1 and 4.2.7
>
> Perhaps this report should also be closed.
Unfor
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68566
--- Comment #14 from ign_christian ---
(In reply to Alex Thurgood from comment #12)
> 1) Open attachment of comment 10
> 2) Sort on master sheet with Lastname ascending - data sorted accordingly
> 3) Click on Dependent sheet - note that data has
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68566
Alex Thurgood changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|medium |highest
Severity|normal
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68566
Alex Thurgood changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68566
--- Comment #12 from Alex Thurgood ---
Confirming on
Version: 4.3.2.2
Build ID: edfb5295ba211bd31ad47d0bad0118690f76407d
OSX 10.9.5
1) Open attachment of comment 10
2) Sort on master sheet with Lastname ascending - data sorted accordingly
3) Cl
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68566
Jean-Baptiste Faure changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68566
Jean-Baptiste Faure changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEEDINFO
--- Comment #11 from Jean
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68566
--- Comment #10 from MICKRU ---
Created attachment 105789
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=105789&action=edit
File working with 4.2.4.2 - but not with newer Office suite
I just realized that the 4.3.1 messed up my test file I
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68566
--- Comment #9 from MICKRU ---
Created attachment 105788
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=105788&action=edit
Sample file to reproduce the bug of sorting
Comments are in the file. Can be used to reproduce the issue. File worki
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68566
MICKRU changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|REOPENED
--- Comment #8 from MICKRU ---
(In re
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68566
Robinson Tryon (qubit) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|BSA, deleterequest |BSA deleterequest
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68566
--- Comment #6 from Jean-Baptiste Faure ---
It is impossible to test further without a test file.
If you still encounter this bug with current stable version, could you attach
an anonymized version of your original file ? An easy mean to anonymiz
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68566
--- Comment #5 from Tollef Fog Heen ---
The content of attachment 84641 has been deleted by
Tollef Fog Heen
who provided the following reason:
Confidential
The token used to delete this attachment was generated at 2014-05-05 15:33:48
UTC.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68566
Joel Madero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|BSA |BSA, deleterequest
CC|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68566
Jean-Baptiste Faure changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #84641|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68566
--- Comment #4 from MICKRU ---
One more thing. The behavior looks to me, as if in 4.0.x releases clears table
cells on dependent sheets before filling them again. Thats why the functional
roles appear correct in that release. In 4.1 releaes this
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68566
--- Comment #3 from MICKRU ---
Hi,
thanks for having a look at my issue. I appreciate this very much.
I just downloaded LibreOffice 4.1.3.2 and can confirm that the T(..) function
now seems to work, because the mailto: URIs on the master sheet w
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68566
GerardF changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gerard.farg...@orange.fr
--- Comment #2 from G
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68566
Jean-Baptiste Faure changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO
CC|
31 matches
Mail list logo
