[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 69416] XProofreader: footnote no special character anymore

2014-04-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69416 Commit Notification libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 69416] XProofreader: footnote no special character anymore

2014-04-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69416 Michael Stahl mst...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |mst...@redhat.com

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 69416] XProofreader: footnote no special character anymore

2014-02-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69416 --- Comment #9 from Marcin Miłkowski milek...@o2.pl --- Well, I don't understand why you're saying that there is no use case for internal codes, as there are numerous things that a grammar checker could check. Note that grammar checkers are not

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 69416] XProofreader: footnote no special character anymore

2014-01-31 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69416 Michael Stahl mst...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||milek...@o2.pl,

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 69416] XProofreader: footnote no special character anymore

2014-01-31 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69416 --- Comment #7 from Michael Stahl mst...@redhat.com --- forgot about this for a while, and now comment #6 says that XProofreader clients actually want to know where the footnotes are, which looks like a new requirement? it appears to me that

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 69416] XProofreader: footnote no special character anymore

2014-01-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69416 --- Comment #6 from Marcin Miłkowski milek...@o2.pl --- Let me explain why the proofreading tool needs to know that it gets a footnote/endnote number: there are strict rules regarding the position of the footnote number in different academic

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 69416] XProofreader: footnote no special character anymore

2013-12-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69416 Michael Stahl mst...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||caol...@redhat.com ---

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 69416] XProofreader: footnote no special character anymore

2013-12-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69416 --- Comment #5 from Michael Stahl mst...@redhat.com --- ok now with a breakpoint in ModelToViewHelper::ModelToViewHelper() / SwDoc::Spell() it's obvious that footnotes get a CH_TXTATR_BREAKWORD and no longer CH_TXTATR_INWORD ... is that

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 69416] XProofreader: footnote no special character anymore

2013-12-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69416 Michael Stahl mst...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 69416] XProofreader: footnote no special character anymore

2013-10-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69416 Qubit qu...@runcibility.com changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|regression | CC|

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 69416] XProofreader: footnote no special character anymore

2013-10-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69416 Kumāra kumara.bhik...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard||regression -- You are

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 69416] XProofreader: footnote no special character anymore

2013-09-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69416 Kumāra kumara.bhik...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 69416] XProofreader: footnote no special character anymore

2013-09-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69416 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Naber misc2...@danielnaber.de --- I wanted to say that the problem occurs starting from about 3.6.5.2, not only in that version. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.