[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70625] Add --cat parameter to make git diffs pretty

2016-02-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70625 Deena Francis (ldcs.co.in) changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|deena.fran...@gmail.com |libreoffice-b...@list

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70625] Add --cat parameter to make git diffs pretty

2016-05-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70625 jan iversen changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|ToBeReviewed| -- You are receiving this mail be

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70625] Add --cat parameter to make git diffs pretty

2014-07-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70625 --- Comment #5 from Deena P.F. --- I'd like to work on this as my first open source contribution. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailin

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70625] Add --cat parameter to make git diffs pretty

2014-07-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70625 --- Comment #6 from Deena P.F. --- There is small problem with the idea, the --convert-to option prints out to stdout a string indicating the file names involved. For example : $ soffice --headless --convert-to txt:Text --outdir /tmp /tmp/filez

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70625] Add --cat parameter to make git diffs pretty

2014-07-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70625 --- Comment #7 from Maxim Monastirsky --- (In reply to comment #6) > Unfortunately, I could not find where this string gets printed in the code > using http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/ It's here: http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/desktop/

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70625] Add --cat parameter to make git diffs pretty

2014-07-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70625 --- Comment #8 from Michael Meeks --- We could of course add a different option to LibreOffice specific to this functionality (perhaps) eg. a --cat parameter ? that could output the plain text on stdout - and avoid the necessity to manage /tmp f

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70625] Add --cat parameter to make git diffs pretty

2014-07-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70625 Deena P.F. changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |deena.fran...@gmail.com |

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70625] Add --cat parameter to make git diffs pretty

2013-10-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70625 Michael Meeks changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard||EasyHack DifficultyBeginner

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70625] Add --cat parameter to make git diffs pretty

2013-10-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70625 Björn Michaelsen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||libreoffice@lists.freedeskt

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70625] Add --cat parameter to make git diffs pretty

2013-10-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70625 --- Comment #2 from Tor Lillqvist --- Please note that there will be lots of false differences between (flat) ODF exports of even only minimally edited versions of a document, though, thanks to gratuitous randomness in the ODF output. See my rece

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70625] Add --cat parameter to make git diffs pretty

2013-10-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70625 --- Comment #3 from Michael Meeks --- Sure - I think the flat-odf idea is prolly not a great one - instead we should just convert to text. Then of course we have a paragraph / line-wrapping problem instead: that small changes perturb that a lot,

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70625] Add --cat parameter to make git diffs pretty

2013-10-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70625 --- Comment #4 from Tor Lillqvist --- Ah, I didn't read the linked article so I thought you meant flat ODF for storage of docs, but yeah, if just for diffing ,hen plain text obviously is better. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are t