https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74693
--- Comment #18 from Rodrigo Nuno Bragança da Cunha ---
I confirm this bug is present in the latest incarnation of LibreOffice. Just
tested 5.1.2.2 and still have missing and badly formatted footnotes, as before.
--
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74693
--- Comment #17 from pub...@hunstig.net ---
The bug is still present in 5.0.5.2 on Windows 10. I _think_ the behaviour is
identical to what I saw in March 2015. An example is attached: Footnote 285 is
incomplete and 286-290 are not shown
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74693
--- Comment #16 from pub...@hunstig.net ---
Created attachment 124402
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=124402=edit
Example created with 5.0.5.2 on Windows 10
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74693
--- Comment #15 from tommy27 ---
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding **
To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74693
--- Comment #14 from pub...@hunstig.net ---
I forgot to mention that I tested this yesterday and observed the same
behaviour in 3.5.2 and 4.4.1.2.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74693
--- Comment #13 from pub...@hunstig.net ---
I agree that this is an error and hope that it will be fixed some time. It cost
me quite a lot of time and nerves to get a 450 pages document with around 2400
footnotes into a correct PDF.
The
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74693
Jay Philips philip...@hotmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74693
--- Comment #12 from Rodrigo Nuno Bragança da Cunha rnbc...@gmail.com ---
Jay Philips, I agree with your assessment. That's what I thought too... and
that's what I saw.
There seems to be a two-pass algorithm doing the pagination job in preview