https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75696

          Priority: medium
            Bug ID: 75696
          Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
           Summary: FORMATTING: Format Paintbrush does not work
          Severity: normal
    Classification: Unclassified
                OS: All
          Reporter: duanpa...@gmail.com
          Hardware: Other
        Whiteboard: BSA
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
           Version: 4.2.1.1 release
         Component: Writer
           Product: LibreOffice

Problem description: 

Test Environment:
Debian Wheezy 7.4,
MS Windows XP

Tested versions:
4.2.1.1 (bad)
4.2.0.2 (bad)
4.0.6 (bad)
3.5.4.2 (better but still with some inappropriateness)

In my tests, most functions of Format Paintbrush in Writer 4.0.6 and above do
not work.

While it is better in 3.5.4.2, it also gave me many surprises, compared to MS
Word 2003, especially when copying character attributes such as Italic or
underline to default format text back and forth.

The behaviors of Format Paintbrush is defined completely in the following
document, isn't it?
Page 180 to 183 of
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/images/a/ac/IG40-ImpressGuideLO.pdf

Steps to reproduce:
1. Do some tests according to Table 6 and Table 7 in page 180 of the document
mentioned above.

Current behavior:
Chaos!
1. Paragraph formats cannot be applied.
2. Only some character formats can be applied correctly, but not all are
correct, for example, in some cases character format with small font size
cannot be copied to the text with larger font size.

Expected behavior:
Paragraph formats and character formats can be copied correctly.

----------------
NOTES
----------------
What are the standard behaviors?
Is there any document that defines the behaviors of Format Paintbrush in more
detail?

I am still not very clear about it.  For example, should underline and Italic
attributes be copied or not; what if we want to copy a normal character format
without underline to text with underline?  For this, Writer will give us a big
surprise although we cannot say it is totally wrong! In MS Word, the related
functions are more intuitive and clean.

Should the behaviors in MS Word be the standard?  I think MS Word does much
better than LO now in this function.

Detail standard can help us set up complete test cases.  Once the standard is
very clear, I think the programming logic should not be that hard and chaotic.
Operating System: All
Version: 4.2.1.1 release

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

Reply via email to