https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78187
Xisco Faulí changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78187
dante19031...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |dante19031...@gmail.com
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78187
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78187
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||39750
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78187
Robinson Tryon (qubit) qu...@runcibility.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78187
tommy27 ba...@quipo.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
CC|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78187
--- Comment #3 from e_...@gmx.de ---
Before Word 2007 I preferred OpenOffice whwn typing math. But Word 2007 changed
this, because AutoCorrection for Math was a giant leap forward in usability.
Easy to configure. With AutoCorrection the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78187
--- Comment #4 from a...@live.dk ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Please create your own report on Unicode support; this report deals with adding
a feature similar to auto-correct. I would gladly discuss Unicode support with
you, but not on this
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78187
--- Comment #1 from e_...@gmx.de ---
An AutoCorrection-feature like in Writer would do it. And instead of the
cumbersome markup of starmath the eqivalent unicode-characters should be used.
⊈ is easier to read than nsubseteq – especially for
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78187
--- Comment #2 from a...@live.dk ---
(In reply to comment #1)
An auto-correct option would be perfect. Calling it that inside the formula
editor might raise a few eyebrows though.
I'm not sure your unicode request belongs on this page. Do you
10 matches
Mail list logo