https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79234
--- Comment #26 from Wiebe van der Worp ---
Confirmed "works for me too" based on
media.vanderworp.org/.dot/.lo/test_s02e15.odt
Many thanks!!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79234
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79234
BogdanB changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||buzea.bog...@libreoffice.or
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79234
--- Comment #23 from QA Administrators ---
Dear Bruce Byfield,
To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been t
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79234
--- Comment #22 from Timur ---
(In reply to Wiebe van der Worp from comment #13)
> Created attachment 127291 [details]
> Minimalistic test document for illustrating repagination errors
I repro in LO 6.5+. No from 2->1, but yes from 1->2 s
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79234
--- Comment #21 from Wiebe van der Worp ---
This bug is still alive in 6.0.6.2. Work around has not changed, add more
trees, anchor objects as character.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.__
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79234
--- Comment #20 from QA Administrators ---
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding **
To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to rete
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79234
Yousuf Philips (jay) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||107396
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79234
Yousuf Philips (jay) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |rb.hensc...@t-online.de