https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82579
--- Comment #12 from jan iversen ---
Please be aware, that this easyhack is considered an important but large scale
cosmetic change as described in
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/LargeScaleChanges
It was in decided by the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82579
jan iversen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|target:4.4.0|ToBeReviewed
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82579
jan iversen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|ToBeReviewed|
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82579
--- Comment #7 from Fernando Montes ---
Well i am going to try to do what is left of this. Hopefully i can get ride of
both headers. Though i doubt getting rid of them will improve performance by
much.
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82579
--- Comment #8 from Tor Lillqvist ---
What made you think this bug has anything to do with performance?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82579
--- Comment #9 from Fernando Montes ---
I don't know. I don't really understand what the bug really is. I understand
its about types conflicting with each other. But much like you said I can't
think of a clear way to do it not using a wrap
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82579
Michael Stahl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||EasyHack DifficultyBeginner
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82579
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|EasyHack DifficultyBeginner |EasyHack DifficultyBeginner
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82579
--- Comment #2 from Commit Notification
---
Tor Lillqvist committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=95a5d7733190d66b1c4761a5bbaa5a2cc2361dd0
fdo#82579: The
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82579
--- Comment #3 from Tor Lillqvist ---
I guess handling TimeValue will be problematic here, as it is defined in a
stable API header, .
OK to break API (and ABI?) by renaming TimeValue there to OslTimeValue?
Or is something more complicated neede
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82579
--- Comment #4 from Tor Lillqvist ---
Forgot the quartz/hide-osl-timevalue.h, would be something like this. (But the
above was just one test approach, not sure at all that it is sane.)
#define TimeValue OslTimeValue
#include
#include
#include
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82579
Stephan Bergmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sberg...@redhat.com
--- Comment #5 fr
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82579
--- Comment #6 from Tor Lillqvist ---
Or we could just say that having premac.h/postmac.h is not that bad after all
and close this bug as WONTFIX. After all, the above approach at least is hardly
any cleaner...
--
You are receiving this mail be
13 matches
Mail list logo
