https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87274
m.a.riosv changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paj...@gmail.com
--- Comment #27 from
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87274
Lenge changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87274
--- Comment #26 from m.a.riosv ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #25)
Respect to this bug, doesn't work for me, there are two equal conditions for
ranges A1:A5 and A6:a16, that remain the same after save and reload.
3.- Yes only
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87274
--- Comment #25 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to m.a.riosv from comment #24)
Please could you clarify what specifically doesn't work? As we already know,
the patch that joins ranges on load doesn't work here; and the patch that works
o
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87274
--- Comment #24 from m.a.riosv ---
Created attachment 142765
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=142765&action=edit
File sample from scratch
Sorry but I'm not able to have it working.
Attached a new sample done fr
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87274
--- Comment #23 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Xavier Van Wijmeersch from comment #22)
> using attachment from comment20 its seems to work
We need to put a clear distinction between this issue (which is about a way to
re-join formats
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87274
--- Comment #22 from Xavier Van Wijmeersch ---
using attachment from comment20 its seems to work
i did a Ctrl+x and then Ctrl+z the conditional formatting corrected itself to a
solid range
Version: 6.1.0.0.beta1+
Build ID: c1d89a237ed678c
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87274
--- Comment #21 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to m.a.riosv from comment #20)
> Sample for test
>
> Sorry, I can't see it working with attached document, maybe it's not on
Well - for some reason, it doesn't work with your sample, reall
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87274
Thomas Lendo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|87351 |116221
Referenced Bugs:
https://
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87274
--- Comment #20 from m.a.riosv ---
Created attachment 138346
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=138346&action=edit
Sample for test
Sorry, I can't see it working with attached document, maybe it's not on
Version: 6
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87274
--- Comment #19 from m.a.riosv ---
Forgive @Mike and specially @Tor, so big thanks @Tor.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing li
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87274
--- Comment #18 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to m.a.riosv from comment #17)
That wasn't me! :) That's Tor.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libr
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87274
--- Comment #17 from m.a.riosv ---
Really, thanks you, @Mike, I'll test when available, hope in a couple of days.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Li
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87274
Kevin Suo changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87274
--- Comment #16 from Mike Kaganski ---
Commit ea55492a6e55290d92a59324b3cb31ed958981ab
(https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=ea55492a6e55290d92a59324b3cb31ed958981ab)
just landed on master towards 6.1 that unifies fragm
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87274
--- Comment #15 from Wolfgang Jäger ---
See also bug#95295, which is NOT a duplicate of this bug, as also this bug is
NOT a duplicate reversely.
Two different issues, this one here only loosely related to the other one!
--
You are rece
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87274
--- Comment #14 from Wolfgang Jäger ---
(In reply to bonbon from comment #11)
> Why MS Office does not have this kind of problem? Is it better.
Now I am talking only of the fragmentaion, not of the (re-) unification which
would mostly not
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87274
--- Comment #13 from Aprax ---
(In reply to bonbon from comment #11)
> Why MS Office does not have this kind of problem? Is it better.
The folks at MS actually think about the design when introducing new "Features"
and test before releasi
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87274
--- Comment #12 from Aprax ---
The best way to fix this is to remove the code that thinks that the ranges need
to be split up and leave it to the user to make any appropriate and sensible
changes when appropriate.
Yes, the issue can be avo
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87274
--- Comment #11 from bonbon ---
Why MS Office does not have this kind of problem? Is it better.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mai
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87274
--- Comment #10 from Aprax ---
It appears that the main issue is that this has been called an Enhancement
rather than what it really is, which is a poorly conceived and designed
"Feature" and which is really a BUG that needs to be fixed.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87274
m.a.riosv changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||r...@jwcca.com
--- Comment #9 from m.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87274
--- Comment #8 from 7qia0t...@sneakemail.com ---
It should honor the entry "A:A" as meaning "apply this conditional formatting
to the entire column" and stop auto-converting it to "A1:A1048576", which then
becomes fragmented. Bug 97956
--
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87274
Arnaud Versini changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87274
m.a.riosv changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arnaud.versini@libreoffice.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87274
m.a.riosv changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bonbonbi...@gmail.com
--- Comment #6
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87274
m.a.riosv changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j...@psilosoph.de
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87274
--- Comment #4 from Jonas Müller ---
I think that this feature is really important.
I noticed that LibreOffice 5.0.1 easily destroys the set range for conditional
formatting.
Steps:
1. Create a new spreadsheet.
2. Highlight A1 to A5 and
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87274
--- Comment #3 from tho...@gmx.de ---
Yes, this would be more than just useful. As a scientist, I work with lots of
different conditional formattings within one sheet, frequently more than 100
cells for one condition, and several conditions
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87274
m.a.riosv changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ariel...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 fro
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87274
Jay Philips changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||87351
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87274
raal changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
32 matches
Mail list logo
