https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91048
--- Comment #14 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Cor Nouws from comment #13)
> So - though not straight forwarded - it looks as WFM?
This is the same as bug 70624; and even though I personally would tell this is
NOTABUG (not WFM, which
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91048
--- Comment #13 from Cor Nouws ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #12)
> Created attachment 183060 [details]
> A proposed document structure with correct ToC order
Looks good. And thanks for the explanation ;)
So - though not str
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91048
Mike Kaganski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91048
--- Comment #12 from Mike Kaganski ---
Created attachment 183060
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=183060&action=edit
A proposed document structure with correct ToC order
A heading in a header is not the correct
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91048
--- Comment #11 from QA Administrators ---
Dear wilcox,
To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91048
Roman Kuznetsov <79045_79...@mail.ru> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||89606
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91048
--- Comment #9 from QA Administrators ---
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding **
To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retes
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91048
Beluga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEW
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91048
--- Comment #7 from wil...@majas.org ---
(In reply to Cor Nouws from comment #5)
> > Or perhaps a gotcha, because I can not see
> > the logic behind this ordering of headings in TOC. For example - why only
> > the first heading is put befor
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91048
--- Comment #6 from wil...@majas.org ---
Created attachment 115302
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=115302&action=edit
Libreoffice 4.4.2.2 table of contents off by one bug. Workaround in Appendix A.
--
You are r
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91048
Cor Nouws changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hardware|x86-64 (AMD64) |All
Version|unspecified
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91048
wil...@majas.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|WOR
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91048
Cor Nouws changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91048
wil...@majas.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91048
--- Comment #2 from wil...@majas.org ---
Thanks for prompt reply!
Yes, when I place it in main text then yeah, no problem.
But business requirements are not defined by me.
Every appendix will have a lot of pages and subheaders. Every (ap
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91048
Cor Nouws changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO
CC|
16 matches
Mail list logo