https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91190
--- Comment #7 from Alex Thurgood ---
(In reply to Henri from comment #5)
See my limited success report with 64bit Access 2016 accdb files in bug 43187
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91190
--- Comment #6 from Alex Thurgood ---
(In reply to Henri from comment #5)
> (1)
> I use MS Access 2010 ×64 and have no problem to use any .accdb or .mdb
> database. Both formats are fully supported !
>
Yes, Access 2010 allowed users to re
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91190
--- Comment #5 from Henri ---
(1)
I use MS Access 2010 ×64 and have no problem to use any .accdb or .mdb
database. Both formats are fully supported !
(2)
I tried again to import Access databases. MS Office 2010 ×64 is installed with
all n
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91190
Yousuf Philips (jay) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||113372
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91190
--- Comment #4 from Alex Thurgood ---
@Henri: what you describe is also applicable to any Access db that LibreOffice,
OpenOffice.org before it, and even StarOffice have ever been able to acess.
This is inherited behaviour.
With the move t
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91190
Alex Thurgood changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unspecified |Inherited From OOo
--
You are re
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91190
--- Comment #3 from Alex Thurgood ---
No one is going to fix this for 32bit MDB databases that not even Microsoft
supports on its 64bit platform.
I suggest closing this, and other similar reports as either WONTFIX, or
NOTOURBUG, or else W
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91190
Alex Thurgood changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91190
Alex Thurgood changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91190
--- Comment #2 from Henri ---
Thanks for the answer. Sure, .accdb would be more important than .mdb to be
imported. Please be aware that indeed people managing databases will hesitate
to switch from MS Office to LibreOffice, as long as eac
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91190
rob...@familiegrosskopf.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirme
11 matches
Mail list logo