[Libreoffice-qa] Litmus problem in Chrome and IE.

2011-11-02 Thread Yifan Jiang
Hi Rimas, Would you help to look a bit of this bug found by occasion, though I am not sure if someone else also meets the same problems. The bug may cause most of IE and Chrome users cannot filter test cases with usually used UI. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42541 It just rem

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Creating test cases for Litmus server

2011-11-02 Thread Yifan Jiang
Hi drew, Sorry I forgot to ask if you will add a Regression test case or New Feature test cases? For 3.4 New Feature test cases, we should put them in branch 3.4 Feature test. To make it less confusing, let me clarify that we usually have 3 separate branches available for populating test cases:

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Creating test cases for Litmus server

2011-11-02 Thread drew
On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 00:36 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > Hi Drew, *, > > (@Drew - sorry for sending twice, forgot about the missing > reply-to-list/need to use reply-to-all) > > On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 12:32 AM, drew wrote: > >> [http://tcm.documentfoundation.org] > > > > Thanks for the hel

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Creating test cases for Litmus server

2011-11-02 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Drew, *, (@Drew - sorry for sending twice, forgot about the missing reply-to-list/need to use reply-to-all) On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 12:32 AM, drew wrote: >> [http://tcm.documentfoundation.org] > > Thanks for the help and with same I've read over some of the existing > test scenarios - up till

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Creating test cases for Litmus server

2011-11-02 Thread drew
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 00:36 -0600, Yi Fan Jiang wrote: > On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 03:30:31PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: > > drew píše v Út 01. 11. 2011 v 10:02 -0400: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I would like to start using the Litmus test case server, specifically > > > for entering some Base related manu

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [libreoffice-projects] [ANN] LibreOffice 3.4.4 RC2 available

2011-11-02 Thread drew
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 17:24 +0100, Heinz W. Simoneit wrote: > Hi Thorsten, *, > > Thorsten Behrens schrieb: > > Hi *, > > > > for 3.4.4 rc2, we're now uploading builds to a public (but > > non-mirrored > [...] > > The list of fixed bugs in this release is here: > > > > http://dev-builds.libreoffi

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [libreoffice-projects] [ANN] LibreOffice 3.4.4 RC2 available

2011-11-02 Thread Heinz W. Simoneit
Hi Thorsten, *, Thorsten Behrens schrieb: Hi *, for 3.4.4 rc2, we're now uploading builds to a public (but non-mirrored [...] The list of fixed bugs in this release is here: http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/src/bugfixes-libreoffice-3-4-4-release-3.4.4.2.log So playing with th

[Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 3.4.4 RC2 available

2011-11-02 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Hi *, for 3.4.4 rc2, we're now uploading builds to a public (but non-mirrored - so don't spread news too widely!) place, as soon as they're available. Grab them here: http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/ If you've a bit of time, please give them a try & report *critical* bugs not yet

[Libreoffice-qa] Web development & I-phone Application

2011-11-02 Thread Boris LAM
http://staff.edmhongkong.com/emailmarketer/unsubscribe.php?M=505736&C=87af5283445ba320bd4a1cc3f3776960&L=23&N=160 ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/

[Libreoffice-qa] [Fwd: [Libreoffice] [ANN] LibreOffice 3.4.4 RC1 available]

2011-11-02 Thread Petr Mladek
Hi Thorsten, could you please sent these pre-release announcement mails to the libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org mailing list as well? IMHO, it is the best place where to find most QA people and attract them for doing a smoke test. Best Regards, Petr _

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [Libreoffice] gravity of raised assertions?

2011-11-02 Thread Terrence Enger
My cross-posting to dev and qa lists is deliberate; if you find that it is the wrong thing to do, I shall have to apologize. On the dev list, On Mon, 2011-10-31 at 10:31 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote: > There has been a lot of discussion in the past about raised > assertions and how seriously they s