Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-3.5.1.1 tag created (3.5.1-rc1)

2012-02-25 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 3:54 AM, Pedro wrote: > > Is this the plan forward? Only versions x.x.0 have Betas? x.y.x with z >= 1 are bugfixes-release.. if they need a 'beta' then we already failed on the principle of what a bugfix-release is. Norbert ___

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-3.5.1.1 tag created (3.5.1-rc1)

2012-02-25 Thread Pedro
Hi Petr, all Petr Mladek wrote > > after some fighting, there have been created the libreoffice-3.5.1.1 > tag for 3.5.1-rc1 release. The corresponding official builds will be > available within next few days. > I'm glad the x.x.x.y (where y is the rc version) numbering model was accepted. This

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] manual testing

2012-02-25 Thread Pedro
e-letter wrote > > Recent comments in the 'users' mailing list indicate that manual > testing is insufficient. What is the procedure to expand the quantity > and quality of manual tests? > > To improve software quality, especially with reference to regression > of previous bugs, a selection of m

[Libreoffice-qa] manual testing

2012-02-25 Thread e-letter
Readers, Recent comments in the 'users' mailing list indicate that manual testing is insufficient. What is the procedure to expand the quantity and quality of manual tests? To improve software quality, especially with reference to regression of previous bugs, a selection of manual tests based upo