[Libreoffice-qa] Litmus, a proposal

2012-03-21 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi all, when the topic of getting testcases for LibreOffice into Ubuntus Checkbox, I finally got myself a Litmus account. I defered that before as "yet another login" I did not want to use. Having a look at it now, I find it quite simple and useful -- it is very well suited to be the tool to get o

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of LibreOffice QA call 2012-03-09 15:00 UTC

2012-03-21 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 06:42:45PM +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > AA- Create some QA EasyHacks (Bjoern) done. tag "TopicQA" added at: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Easy_Hacks_Bugzilla_Whiteboard_Status https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Easy_Hacks_by_Topic

[Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 3.5.2 RC1 test builds available

2012-03-21 Thread Fridrich Strba
Hi *, for the upcoming new version 3.5.2, the RC1 builds now start to be available on pre-releases. This build is slated to be first release candidate build on the way towards 3.5.2, please refer to our release plan timings here: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan#3.5_release Builds

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Litmus, a proposal

2012-03-21 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 02:27:20PM +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > The first and most important one is: it is behind its own login -- and that > prevents the casual bypasser to get involved and interested. IMHO, we > absolutely need to change that. The testcases should be browsable without a > lo

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Litmus, a proposal

2012-03-21 Thread Pedro
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote > > Since there had been no immediate complains about this: > Actually I'm glad you reached the same conclusion that I suggested a month ago on the QA list... http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-manual-testing-tp3774646p3780394.html But adding it to the

[Libreoffice-qa] LibreOffice QA call 2012-03-23 15:00UTC

2012-03-21 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi there, this is the reminder that we have the next QA call on Friday. 2012-03-23 1500UTC Prototype agenda below, please reply with topics you would like to dicuss and feel free to join even if you are not explicitly invited (as this is not our first call, we might have some time for more deta

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Litmus, a proposal

2012-03-21 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi Pedro, On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:45:29AM -0700, Pedro wrote: > But adding it to the "easy hacks" doesn't it mean that it's off limits to > the usual collaborators No, it only means that these task do not require a particulary deep knowledge of some arcane corners of the LibreOffice codebase.

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Litmus, a proposal

2012-03-21 Thread Rimas Kudelis
2012.03.21 21:27, Bjoern Michaelsen rašė: On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:45:29AM -0700, Pedro wrote: But adding it to the "easy hacks" doesn't it mean that it's off limits to the usual collaborators No, it only means that these task do not require a particulary deep knowledge of some arcane corners

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Litmus, a proposal

2012-03-21 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:26:49PM +0200, Rimas Kudelis wrote: > For the reference: > * I have a Litmus TODO list at > https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Litmus_TODO. I'd be glad if you > added bugzilla links and missing entries to it. As I've mentioned > before, it would be really nice to maintai

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Litmus, a proposal

2012-03-21 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:16:51PM +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > > I don't know, but it may not make sense to keep improving Litmus at that > > point. After all, if they settled for a rewrite, you just have to expect it > > to be so much better than the old tool, right? :) > That might be the c

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Litmus, a proposal

2012-03-21 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:16:51PM +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > They already have a staging server, but I cant get into it. Register mail just took a while. I now can walk around in: https://caseconductor-dev.allizom.org Its is all looking very nifty and web-2.0-ish. But unlike Litmus, I hav

[Libreoffice-qa] Este fin de semana en Valencia y el proximo en Zaragoza

2012-03-21 Thread Ciencia y Espiritu
X Congreso Ciencia y Espíritu Valencia - Valencia 24 y 25 de Marzo de 2012 en la Sala Carolina - Hacia una humanidad más honesta, más

[Libreoffice-qa] Este fin de semana en Valencia y el proximo en Zaragoza

2012-03-21 Thread Ciencia y Espiritu
X Congreso Ciencia y Espíritu Valencia - Valencia 24 y 25 de Marzo de 2012 en la Sala Carolina - Hacia una humanidad más honesta, más

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Litmus, a proposal

2012-03-21 Thread Pedro
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote > > Register mail just took a while. > Which brings us to the original problem: why doesn't it support OpenID from the beginning? In a little over a month, AskLibO already has nearly 600 users. How much clearer does the message need to be? -- View this message in conte

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Litmus, a proposal

2012-03-21 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 04:00:35PM -0700, Pedro wrote: > Which brings us to the original problem: why doesn't it support OpenID from > the beginning? Please refrain from putting out non-constructive, rhetorical questions on this list. You wouldnt like the answers(*). If you have a constructive pro

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Litmus, a proposal

2012-03-21 Thread Pedro
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote > > If you have a constructive proposal or > got somebody interested in implementing what you are missing, please speak > up. > I thought it was what WE (you , me, TDF, the LO project,etc) are missing. And I do have a constructive proposal. If the Mozilla folks don't

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Litmus, a proposal

2012-03-21 Thread Rimas Kudelis
2012.03.22 01:00, Pedro rašė: Bjoern Michaelsen wrote Register mail just took a while. Which brings us to the original problem: why doesn't it support OpenID from the beginning? In a little over a month, AskLibO already has nearly 600 users. How much clearer does the message need to be? Moz