Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bug Triage best practice: Change or not change assignee?

Bjoern Michaelsen schrieb: Assignee is and has always been the guy who "owns" the bug. Hi Björn, That's something to what I might agree. But when I ask John Doe to contribute some more information, I (QA) remain "owner". But that are quibbles. > This is how ~every other open source proje

[Libreoffice-qa] MAB additions.

I suggestion addition of the following bugs - Bug 32991 -- This's farely used in doc document, and may break the complete formatting of the document in some cases. Bug 33263 Bug 48714 Bug 48713 -- Same test case as 48714 ___ List Name: Libreoffice-

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [Bug 37361] LibreOffice 3.5 most annoying bugs

On 04/20/12 15:44, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: Hi, please excuse me, but I am getting a little impatient. I asked you not to bore all CC in Bug 37361 with those "I do no know what to do" comments. If you do not know leave the work for those who know and concentrate on improving information in the

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 3.5.2 RC2 test builds available

Michael Meeks-2 wrote > > Sure :-) luckily it is a really trivial bug to fix - it looks (to me) > like the same bug as bug#45584 - Thorsten: dudie - you fixed only 1/2 a > blocker bug symptom (ie. only for Mac) :-) > >> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46901 > > So - Fridrich

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Information in Master builds About box

Thank you for creating the Bug report, Cor. Actually I think this is a regression. Should I add the keyword? I also noticed the Esc regression. I'm glad you reported it and that it is already fixed (also fixed under Windows). -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Francois Tigeot wrote: > On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 09:09:34AM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Francois Tigeot >> wrote: >> > On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 04:11:18PM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: >> >> >> >> * tinderboxen / status (Norbe

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 09:09:34AM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Francois Tigeot > wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 04:11:18PM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: > >> > >> * tinderboxen / status (Norbert) > >>       + bytemark machine #2 > >>               + workin

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Information in Master builds About box

Pedro wrote (21-04-12 12:18) The new About box in branch 3.6.x is indeed extremely nice. But the version information is extremely incomplete version 3.6.0alpha0+ (Build ID: e00e693) related: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48659 -- - Cor - http://nl.libreoffice.org ___

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] What to do with old OO.oeg bugs?

Florian Reisinger schrieb: > I just found a bug, which goes back to the latest OO.org version I have > (2.3.0). (See bug https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48968 ) Hi, most of those inherited bugs are marked due to "Inhe

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Francois Tigeot wrote: > Hey, > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 04:11:18PM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: >> >> * tinderboxen / status (Norbert) >>       + bytemark machine #2 >>               + working on *BSD in virtualbox with little >>                 joy help apprecia

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Information in Master builds About box

On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 03:18:41AM -0700, Pedro wrote: > For QA this is mostly useless. The only information you can get from this is > about the core repository... Which is where 99% of the action is, so please refrain from exaggerations. > LibreOffice 3.5.3.1 > Build ID: 21cb047-d7e6025-9ba54f

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bug Triage best practice: Change or not change assignee?

Hi, On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 09:53:22AM +0200, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: > I believe it is a very bad idea to use that field to show who > should contribute additional information to the bug report, the > "Assigned To" field should remain reserved for the competent person > person who will fix the b

[Libreoffice-qa] Information in Master builds About box

The new About box in branch 3.6.x is indeed extremely nice. But the version information is extremely incomplete version 3.6.0alpha0+ (Build ID: e00e693) For QA this is mostly useless. The only information you can get from this is about the core repository... Any other build using the same core

[Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 3.5.3 RC1 available

Dear Community, The Document Foundation is happy to announce the first release candidate of LibreOffice 3.5.3. The upcoming 3.5.3 will be the third in a series of frequent bugfix releases on our feature-packed 3.5 code line. Please be aware that LibreOffice 3.5.3 RC1 is not ready for production us

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 3.5.3 RC1 test builds available

Hi Fridrich, *, this mail never reached the l10n@ and projects@ but only the LibO-QA. Is there a problem with the mail-system or something else? Greetings k-j Am 20.04.2012 12:44, schrieb Fridrich Strba: Hi *, for the upcoming new version 3.5.3, the RC1 builds now start to be available on pr

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bug Triage best practice: Change or not change assignee?

Hello Nino, bello Bjoern, hello all, IMHO "not change"! I can't remember that we ever discussed to modify "Assigned to" related to "NEEDINFO", and it has never been used that way, not in the various other projects using Bugzilla I joined, and also not for LibO - except by Nino, who did not kno