[Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla: Ever Confirmed changes when switching to NEEDINFO state

2012-07-27 Thread David Tardon
Hi, I have noticed that if I switch an UNCONFIRMED bug to NEEDINFO, Ever Confirmed changes to 1 (see https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_activity.cgi?id=52558). Surely this is not intended behavior? D. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail addre

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LibreOffice QA Call 2012-07-27

2012-07-27 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi all, here are the minutes of the LibreOffice QA call on 2012-07-27 14:00 UTC. Additions and corrections welcome. attendance: Petr, Rainer, Norbert, Bjoern completed action items: + - Invite active bugwranglers to next call/QA list, CC Rainer (Bjoern) - authorative close of bugzilla versio

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LibreOffice code coverage

2012-07-27 Thread bfo [via Document Foundation Mail Archive]
julien2412 wrote > > There's a tracker about coverage, see > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38840 > For the moment, no one seemed to be on it (perhaps I'm wrong). > Hi. What a discovery! I have found some scripts already in the codebase http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/s

[Libreoffice-qa] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-3.6.0.4 tag created

2012-07-27 Thread Petr Mladek
Hi, there have been created the libreoffice-3.6.0.4 tag (aka rc4). The corresponding official builds will be available within next few days. It will be used as final if no blocker is found. We did this extra release candidate because of blockers: + https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.c

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Minutes of the ESC call 2012-07-26

2012-07-27 Thread Petr Mladek
Thorsten Behrens píše v Pá 27. 07. 2012 v 01:22 +0200: > * Release Engineering update (Petr) > + 3.6.0 / RC3 status > * rc3 - uploading to mirrors > * have rc4 on Monday due to Win32 startup bug We do rc4 today (Friday). The Windows rc3 build was wrong, so we needed another build a

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Minutes of the ESC call 2012-07-26

2012-07-27 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi, On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 01:22:12AM +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > + notify all committers when we have a nice simple, minimal > statement of what is required for gerrit written (Bjoern) -> currently blocked on Michael reviewing the mail template Best, Bjoern _