Hi Joel,
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 03:31:19PM -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
> Is there a way to see a list of every page for our wiki page. Even better
> would be some kind of hierarchy but if that's not possible a straight list
> is fine. I'm trying to see what everything is and where it is, some of it
Is there a way to see a list of every page for our wiki page. Even better
would be some kind of hierarchy but if that's not possible a straight list
is fine. I'm trying to see what everything is and where it is, some of it I
think should be linked together or combined even but it's hard to get a
gr
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote
>
> I dont think discussing this on a mailing list will help us find the
> silver
> bullet to the problems you describe. However, you are most invited to just
> us
> on the next QA Call on August, 23rd 2012 1400UTC, discussing these topics
> on
> the phone is usually a lot
Hi bfo,
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 08:42:56AM -0700, bfo wrote:
>...
I dont think discussing this on a mailing list will help us find the silver
bullet to the problems you describe. However, you are most invited to just us
on the next QA Call on August, 23rd 2012 1400UTC, discussing these topics on
Rainer Bielefeld-2 wrote
>
> For some of these bugs simply the Bug description still is not
> satisfying so that I can understand developers that they pick bugs where
> they can start fixing with out much additional preliminary research.
>
Hi!
Sometimes I am not even sure that devs use Bugzil
Jochen wrote
>
> IMHO has bfo some right. But:
> 1) "bankruptcy of this system" is a little bit exaggerated.
>
Hi!
Not at all. After reviewing >400 bugs (and counting) I could double 3.5MAB
numbers in an instant.
The main problem is that MAB is a battlefield for users without QA control
and dev
Dear Community,
The Document Foundation is happy to announce the second release
candidate of LibreOffice 3.5.6. The upcoming 3.5.6 will be the sixth
in a series of frequent bugfix releases for our 3.5 code line. Please
be aware that LibreOffice 3.5.6 RC2 is not yet ready for production
use, you sh
> On Thu, 2012-08-09 at 15:27 +0200, Timur Gadzo wrote:
>> I find that there should be an explanation in MAB 3.6. when exactly
>> will fixes for bugs resolved in "LibreOffice 3.5 most annoying bugs"
>> be included in LO 3.6.
>
> Right; that's not clear. Personally I prefer a rather shorter, m
Hi Rainer,
I am forwarding this to the docs list to see what input there might be
from the docs team. I will forward any results to the QA list. I know
there are a couple of people working on the documentation for Base, so
they might have some ideas...
@docs team: I'm forwarding the mail below th
Hello David, Hello András,
some users on started a bug hunting
initiative to find and report Bugs related to Database / Report Builder
- with great results, as you can see in Bugzilla.
One of the results is, that Help and documentation for that tool
currently are terrible rare, contain seve
Hi *,
Am 10.08.2012 08:27, schrieb Rainer Bielefeld:
bfo schrieb:
Personally I would declare bankruptcy of this system.
IMHO has bfo some right. But:
1) "bankruptcy of this system" is a little bit exaggerated.
2) Whinging and grouching will not help
We need a strategy with a positive, enco
bfo schrieb:
.
It is not a big surprise that 3.5MAB has already 3.4MAB bugs imported. Now,
most of them will become 3.6MAB, which is ridiculous. Personally I would
declare bankruptcy of this system.
Hi,
we are talking about these [1] Bugs. 40 3.5 MAB reported before 3.5 is
really a lot ...
12 matches
Mail list logo
