On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Joel Madero wrote:
> This isn't for end-users, it's for QA team..and it's our job to do as
> much as possible to help the developers. I know when I'm doing the
> development side I appreciate whatever previous info users and QA can
> provide. It's maximizing the
This isn't for end-users, it's for QA team..and it's our job to do as
much as possible to help the developers. I know when I'm doing the
development side I appreciate whatever previous info users and QA can
provide. It's maximizing the efficiency of our abilitieslimited # of
developers mean
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Joel Madero wrote:
> I'll bring this up at our next conference call and see if there is a
> possible solution.
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Joel
>
>
May I humbly note that I personally feel that developers should be
able to produce their own backtraces, given a solid repro
I'll bring this up at our next conference call and see if there is a
possible solution.
Best Regards,
Joel
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 12:48 PM, John Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Joel Madero wrote:
> >
> >
> > Sounds good, but I agree with John that better instructions are needed
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Joel Madero wrote:
>
>
> Sounds good, but I agree with John that better instructions are needed. I'm
> working on a new triage page and hopefully in there we can get someone to
> contribute incredibly precise, easy for noobs, instructions for every type
> of backtra
The best solution would be to have a debug symbol server, then there
would be easily accessible debug symbols even for the release builds.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 10:44 AM, John Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Michael Meeks
> wrote:
> > Hi John,
> >
> > You can always make it easier for a developer to solve - and the
> easier
> > it is, the more likely it is to get solved quickly. Ways to do that are:
> >
> >
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> You can always make it easier for a developer to solve - and the
> easier
> it is, the more likely it is to get solved quickly. Ways to do that are:
>
> * getting a stack-trace with full debugging symbols
>
>
Hi John,
On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 19:10 +0200, John Smith wrote:
> Maybe im just dumb, but: Once you have provided a reliable and
> reproducible test case (in this case, download the odt file attached
> to the report and save it as docx in libreoffice), is there still a
> need to provide further info
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Joel Madero wrote:
> Wrong Bug, dammit, my bad. Here is the proper one, attachment is there and
> functioning, I had 5 open FDO tabs in FF and picked the wrong one.
>
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48569
>
> My apologies
>
> Joel
>
Maybe im just dumb
Wrong Bug, dammit, my bad. Here is the proper one, attachment is there and
functioning, I had 5 open FDO tabs in FF and picked the wrong one.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48569
My apologies
Joel
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 9:57 AM, John Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 6:38 PM
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Joel Madero wrote:
> I don't see that helping much, as the developer who takes this one can
> quickly do this themselves. A working doc only takes 2 seconds to make.
>
> Best Regards,
> Joel
>
Another random thought then: Is there a way to reproduce the issue
that d
I don't see that helping much, as the developer who takes this one can
quickly do this themselves. A working doc only takes 2 seconds to make.
Best Regards,
Joel
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 9:35 AM, John Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Joel Madero wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Came acro
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Joel Madero wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Came across this bug FDO#45570 and I've already nominated as a most annoying
> bug but I think that devs might appreciate me getting some kind of a log or
> something together for the crash. What type of log should I create and how
>
Hi All,
Came across this bug FDO#45570 and I've already nominated as a most
annoying bug but I think that devs might appreciate me getting some kind of
a log or something together for the crash. What type of log should I create
and how do I go about doing this (basic steps, my knowledge of termino
Hi,
Participants: Florian, Petr
We had great chat but really missed the others. Please, try to join next
time or say what is the blocker to join.
pending action items:
- write update scenario testcase in Litmus/MozTrap (Kendy)
- Invite active bugwranglers to next call/QA list, CC Rainer (
Hi Nino,
That's the beauty of our project, everyone's opinion is respected :) I'll
try to avoid adding any work to website team and see what method works best
to get these triaged and organized best. As of now, google doc + fdo seems
to be doing the trick :) Ultimately might just make a macro to a
There are 12 bugs from 2011 that haven't been triaged. I think they have
been kind of ignored because they require certain things (such as Mac or UX
input or advanced computer understanding :) ). Could someone(s) please get
these done, then at least we're up to 2012 :) If you see one or more that
y
Hi Petr,
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 12:16:30PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> BTW: Is it possible to easily copy test case from one version to the
> other using the UI? Or is there some alternative of "git cherry-pick"
> where you could apply changes to other branches?
Yes, the in-test-case version se
Yi Fan Jiang píše v Pá 07. 09. 2012 v 02:44 -0600:
> Hi Petr, all,
>
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 12:26:48PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > Yi Fan Jiang píše v Čt 06. 09. 2012 v 03:47 -0600:
> > > >Yi Fan Jiang píše v Čt 06. 09. 2012 v 02:50 -0600:
> > > >> 4. In the page, make sure the version of the
Hi Petr, all,
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 12:26:48PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> Yi Fan Jiang píše v Čt 06. 09. 2012 v 03:47 -0600:
> > >Yi Fan Jiang píše v Čt 06. 09. 2012 v 02:50 -0600:
> > >> 4. In the page, make sure the version of the case is switched to
> > *0*
> > >> by:
> > >>
> > >> - Aro
On 09/06/2012 06:55 PM, Michael Stahl wrote:
On 06/09/12 17:42, Michael Meeks wrote:
i don't have an opinion whether --enable-dbgutil should by default
enable symbols or not.
First of all, note that --enable-symbols is a misnomer. It is not
per-se about any kind of symbols (like not stripping
22 matches
Mail list logo
