Cor Nouws schrieb:
a - hunting bugs in 3.7
Hi Cor,
intensive Bug wrangling always is good, but currently I have more
concerns how to get a working 3.6.3 (at least for me that's completely
unusable).
3 Weeks ago (or so) I was frustrated that we still had nearby 300
UNCONFIRMED 3.6. possi
Unless I am mistaken, all the bugs mentioned in the "Most Annoying Bugs"
section (bottom of page) of our 3.6 Features webpage have been resolved?
Can I go ahead and update that section with strike-throughs and mark
them as resolved?[1]
Cheers,
Marc
[1] https://www.libreoffice.org/download/3-6
Hi Rainer,
Rainer Bielefeld wrote (02-11-12 09:18)
Cor Nouws schrieb:
a - hunting bugs in 3.7
intensive Bug wrangling always is good, but [...]
3 Weeks ago (or so) I was frustrated that we still had nearby 300
UNCONFIRMED 3.6. possible regressions, now we have more than 430 [1],
and I thin
Hi Marc,
On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 05:25 -0400, Marc Paré wrote:
> Unless I am mistaken, all the bugs mentioned in the "Most Annoying Bugs"
> section (bottom of page) of our 3.6 Features webpage have been resolved?
> Can I go ahead and update that section with strike-throughs and mark
> them as res
Hi Pedro,
On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 03:20 -0700, Pedro wrote:
> ol klaus-jürgen weghorn wrote
> > my 3.6.2.1 is "up to date". Shouldn't be so.
>
> My 3.5.7.1 install reports "LibreOffice 3.5 is up to date."
> Shouldn't be so.
Sorry - I've not published the ESC minutes yet; Kendy is pulling t
On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 10:38 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
> So then I suggest that we make triage of open bugs a goal as well, under
> the flag of 3.7-bug hunt party - which hopefully will attract lots of hands.
Yes indeed; I'd love to have some more help looking through these bus
filed vs 3.7
* Present:
+ Kendy, Stephan, Eike, Markus, Michael M, Petr, Lubos,
Norbert, Thorsten, Caolan, Ahmad.
+ bad week for US overlap; regrets from Joel etc.
* Completed Action Items
+ issues to look into if we can
+ fdo#34548 - review Michael's patch (Th
Sophie Gautier píše v St 31. 10. 2012 v 18:18 +0100:
> On 31/10/2012 16:36, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Petr Mladek wrote on 2012-10-31 15:35:
> >> I have seen that people put large test documents into wiki and mentioned
> >> links in bugzilla or E-mails.
> >>
> >> Another solution
Hi,
Petr Mladek wrote on 2012-11-02 14:12:
I wonder if wiki is good for this purpose or it there is a better
solutions. I am afraid that we could not increase the limit in bugzilla
easily.
the wiki is used for that, lacking alternatives, but it is definitely
not optimal. :/
If you let me k
On 02/11/2012 16:13, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Petr Mladek wrote on 2012-11-02 14:12:
>
>> I wonder if wiki is good for this purpose or it there is a better
>> solutions. I am afraid that we could not increase the limit in bugzilla
>> easily.
>
> the wiki is used for that, lacking alt
Florian Effenberger píše v Pá 02. 11. 2012 v 16:13 +0100:
> Hi,
>
> Petr Mladek wrote on 2012-11-02 14:12:
>
> > I wonder if wiki is good for this purpose or it there is a better
> > solutions. I am afraid that we could not increase the limit in bugzilla
> > easily.
>
> the wiki is used for that
Hi Sophie, *,
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Sophie Gautier wrote:
> [...]
> What we need is a very simple way for a French user to send an
> attachment. If he needs to subscribe or register elsewhere and elsewhere
> again, I fear we'll just have to close the bug because he will never
> come bac
Hi Michael, all
Michael Meeks-2 wrote
> Sorry - I've not published the ESC minutes yet; Kendy is pulling the
> lever to upgrade 3.5.0-3 to 3.6.3 - and we planned to wait a week to see
> if there are any user-horror stories before promoting 3.6.3 to everyone
> as the upgrade path.
>
>
Hi!
I frequently proposed, that we should ping people: "Check it with latest
version, or we leave the bug closed..."
So here the PDF: https://www.box.com/s/tj9r79uphr3ls26fv4lt (Made with
MS Office 2010 because I had difficulties with LibreOffice)
IMHO we should ping every bug submitter wit
Hi,
Petr Mladek wrote on 2012-11-02 16:38:
We need a place where to share test documents that are needed for
reproducing bugs. It would be useful in different scenarios:
* discussing problems on regional or global mailing lists; such
files could get limited lifetime
* too big d
Michael Meeks schrieb:
Sorry - I've not published the ESC minutes yet; Kendy is pulling the
lever to upgrade 3.5.0-3 to 3.6.3 - and we planned to wait a week to see
if there are any user-horror stories
Hi all,
for me most of 3.6.3 works very well, but for users like me using
spreadh
16 matches
Mail list logo
