On Nov 3, 2012 12:32 PM, "Florian Reisinger" wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> My program soon is going to be final:
http://flosmind.wordpress.com/libreoffice-server-install-gui/ and
http://extensions.libreoffice.org/extension-center/libreoffice-server-installation-gui(Here
1.9.8 is shown as the latest version,
Hi!
My program soon is going to be final:
http://flosmind.wordpress.com/libreoffice-server-install-gui/ and
http://extensions.libreoffice.org/extension-center/libreoffice-server-installation-gui
(Here 1.9.8 is shown as the latest version, but it will download the
newest anyway...)
PLEASE te
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 03:36:47PM +0100, Florian Reisinger wrote:
> On the other way HardHack nomination process and fixing rate is
> quite good example that when you show which bugs should be fixed,
> this could work and better the quality of the product. The time has
> come to introduce this on
Hi!
This mail seems to only have reached me...
Rainer Bielefeld-2 wrote
If we would have 10 people who do an extra review per day for
the Bugs from Florians queries, we would be through before next spring.
Hi!
It is possible, but I am concerned about another thing. Look at this chart:
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 02:16:55PM +0100, Florian Reisinger wrote:
> I want to make life easier, but maybe it is the wrong approach, but
> IMHO bugs reported against old beta (and RC) versions should get
> checked, because (the possibility is higher in beta stadium) this bug
> has been already
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 04:54:40AM -0700, bfo wrote:
> It is possible, but I am concerned about another thing. Look at this chart:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/reports.cgi?product=LibreOffice&datasets=NEW
> There are already more than 3500 bugs ready to go for developers. What good
> if we add a
Hi!
Am 03.11.2012 um 13:18 schrieb Bjoern Michaelsen
:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 01:57:27PM -0700, bfo wrote:
>> There was one autoclosing nightmare recently and I thought no one dare to
>> propose another one any time soon... The problem is that most of bugs are
>> not checked by anyone. As my
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 10:50:57AM +0100, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
> So it is. If we would have 10 people who do an extra review per day
> for the Bugs from Florians queries, we would be through before next
> spring.
... if nobody files any new incomplete bugs, I assume?
Best,
Bjoern
___
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 01:57:27PM -0700, bfo wrote:
> There was one autoclosing nightmare recently and I thought no one dare to
> propose another one any time soon... The problem is that most of bugs are
> not checked by anyone. As my experience shows - one manual ping can resolve
> most issues or
Rainer Bielefeld-2 wrote
> If we would have 10 people who do an extra review per day for
> the Bugs from Florians queries, we would be through before next spring.
Hi!
It is possible, but I am concerned about another thing. Look at this chart:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/reports.cgi?product=Lib
bfo schrieb:
There was one autoclosing nightmare recently and I thought no one dare to
propose another one any time soon...
Hi,
I agree! There is no benefit from putting bugs from 1 drawer to an other
one without any research, but all these mass changes cause lots of
emails, break queries
Hi Michael,
Le 2012-11-02 06:38, Michael Meeks a écrit :
Hi Marc,
On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 05:25 -0400, Marc Paré wrote:
Unless I am mistaken, all the bugs mentioned in the "Most Annoying Bugs"
section (bottom of page) of our 3.6 Features webpage have been resolved?
Can I go ahead and update that
12 matches
Mail list logo
