Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

2012-11-11 Thread David Tardon
Hi, On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 09:05:02PM +0100, Michael Stahl wrote: > On 10/11/12 17:46, Michael Meeks wrote: > > Hi Alex, > > > > On Sat, 2012-11-10 at 10:51 +0100, Alex Thurgood wrote: > >> I see your points and concerns. Couldn't we have, as a potential > >> alternative, a hack (easy or not, I

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ToDos rename 3.7 to 4.0

2012-11-11 Thread V Stuart Foote
So I was edited out of the 3.7 - 4.0 todo rename matrix. Know it happens, but thanks Niko only a little harsh... Here is the item, judge for yourself if it should have come out: − | 12 − | verify consistent ''a11y'' support − | 1 − | QA actions upon implementation of ATK/AT-SPI and IAccessibl

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ToDos rename 3.7 to 4.0

2012-11-11 Thread V Stuart Foote
Michael, I have assumed that since the ASF Board has graduated the OpenOffice project from incubator to an Apache "top level" project, that all the contributed code base had been accepted and now falls under ALv2 provision. When I've looked at the IBM and Oracle contributed source code the indivi

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ToDos rename 3.7 to 4.0

2012-11-11 Thread Michael Stahl
On 11/11/12 20:59, Robert Großkopf wrote: > Hi *, > > when I read "Version 4.0" I think there should happen a lot in a program > for a complete new version. > > Since many years for Base was discussed, that there has to be a change > in the database of OOo- and LO-Base. But this discussion, if th

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ToDos rename 3.7 to 4.0

2012-11-11 Thread Michael Stahl
On 11/11/12 20:17, V Stuart Foote wrote: > I'd also comment, that similar for the AOOo folks, there is a lot of work to > be done to implement the IBM contributed \winaccessibility "native" code and > move Windows clients off of the Java Accessibility Bridge and into parity > with the other OSs by

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ToDos rename 3.7 to 4.0

2012-11-11 Thread Robert Großkopf
Hi *, when I read "Version 4.0" I think there should happen a lot in a program for a complete new version. Since many years for Base was discussed, that there has to be a change in the database of OOo- and LO-Base. But this discussion, if this should be the newer HSQLDB or anything else, didn't p

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ToDos rename 3.7 to 4.0

2012-11-11 Thread V Stuart Foote
Hmm, so looking at Michael's minutes the 8 Nov ESC minutes there was this one entry regards a 4.0 release. AA: + bump versions sooner than later, to find hard-coded '3's (Petr) And in the initial wiki table you included an item: 10 Marketing issues2 We need some explication f

[Libreoffice-qa] ToDos rename 3.7 to 4.0

2012-11-11 Thread Rainer Bielefeld
Hi all, I started for collection and discussion of all activities related to that decision. Please feel free to add more action items and / or comments. Discussion if necessary please here in this thread on or on Wiki Discussion