-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All,
I thought that mails for the BSA always went to the QA-list. But I saw
last that the bugs for the BSA are sent to the website-list. What is
the list to discuss the BSA on?
At the moment when we create a new feature for the BSA then we must
u
Stephan Bergmann wrote (28-11-12 11:23)
On 11/28/2012 10:40 AM, Cor Nouws wrote:
Stephan Bergmann wrote (24-11-12 11:40)
Given that testing migration from existing user profiles generally
requires manual activity anyway (to remove potentially existing MIGRATED
flag files from existing user pr
Open invite to anyone wanting to join QA call. Approximately 1 hour long.
All information including call in #'s and prototype agenda can be found
here, additional items welcome, either email me or edit the wiki directly.
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA_Call_Current_Agenda
Regards,
Joel
--
Hi Petr
Petr Mladek wrote
> I mean to do the official beta builds with --enable-release-build
> configure option. It will produce LibreOffice product instead of LODev
> => it will act as an official release => you will be able to test
> configuration migration exactly the same as for final build.
Pedro píše v Út 27. 11. 2012 v 09:10 -0800:
> > Another solution would be to build 4.0-betas with release
> > configuration. I guess that it can be installed in parallel with LO-3
> > even on Windows because it uses another prefix, ... How does that
> > sound?
>
> What do you mean "release config
Stephan Bergmann-2 wrote
> If LOdev versions indeed store their user profiles centrally (at
> ~/.config/lodev/{3,4} ? correct me if I'm wrong), then the scenario of
> reusing an existing user profile from a previous LOdev version N1 in a
> new LOdev version N2, where N2 >= N1 and N1 and N2 are e
On 11/28/2012 10:40 AM, Cor Nouws wrote:
Stephan Bergmann wrote (24-11-12 11:40)
Whether a given installation should try to migrate from certain existing
user profiles, should start with a fresh user profile of its own, should
reuse some existing user profile, etc., certainly varies depending o
Hi Norbert
Norbert Thiebaud wrote
> I count 3 out of 13 that seems to have their '@' sign gobbled up that
> a far cry from 'most'...
> that being said it would be best indeed to ping the owner of these box
> to get them to fix that...
And another 2 (named W2008R2) refer to the host OS not the Ta
Hi Stephan,
Stephan Bergmann wrote (28-11-12 10:06)
Can one of you please tell me if there is a different result when one
does what you did and between manually copying the user profile to the
new versions' user directory?
You mean, "rm -rf ~/.config/lodev/4 && mkdir -p ~/.config/lodev && cp
On 11/27/2012 11:31 PM, Cor Nouws wrote:
Petr Mladek wrote (27-11-12 17:54)
We listen :-) Well, the testing can be done even with Dev builds. I
installed the daily build from
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/Linux-x86_64_11-Release-Configuration/master/current/
and did the following step
Hi,
due to a wrong version string in 3.6.4.2, Fridrich just created the
libreoffice-3.6.4.3 tag (aka rc3). The corresponding official builds
will be available within next few days.
Now, you might switch your current 3-6 source tree to it using:
./g fetch --tags
./g checkout -b tag-libreoffice-3.
11 matches
Mail list logo
