Re: [Libreoffice-qa] 4.0 Test week/marathon Re: [...-qa] 3.7 bug hunt party ?

Perhaps a little bit OT, but what is the correct link to download the 4.0.0 Beta? Below I saw "Beta1 build is in progress. Linux and MAC packages are even already available at http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/"; but the only Beta available at this link is for the Intel Mac.

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] 4.0 Test week/marathon Re: [...-qa] 3.7 bug hunt party ?

Hi Yifan :-) Yifan Jiang wrote (05-12-12 08:08) You will probably find http://manual-test.libreoffice.org is usable now, but we still need some tuning of Moztrap. The login seems not working with the new name :) I'll update everything in the coming weeks. Please stick to the vm12 until there's

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] 4.0 Test week/marathon Re: [...-qa] 3.7 bug hunt party ?

Joel Madero wrote (07-12-12 00:02) Want me to do this? I'll put a rough draft with some collected intentions and would be really happy if you can help improving, making it a better read :-) Just a note, I went through every unconfirmed bug against 4+ releases (master & alph

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] 4.0 Test week/marathon Re: [...-qa] 3.7 bug hunt party ?

> > > Is there any plan to make a wiki page or something about the event? >> > > Sure. Examples from some of the earlier events: > > http://wiki.**documentfoundation.org/QA/**BugHunting_Session_3.5.0.-1 > > http://wiki.**docu

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] 4.0 Test week/marathon Re: [...-qa] 3.7 bug hunt party ?

Hi Joel, all, Joel Madero wrote (06-12-12 16:09) I think that testing from Thursday 13 to Wednesday 19th is perfectly fine and beta1 state looks promising for it. OK, I'll go for the 14-19th - something in me says that's better. I've checked and there is no real / important doubling with the

[Libreoffice-qa] Libo 4.0 Triaging Update

Hi All, I just got done going through the entire list of unconfirmed bugs. I was able to triage about 60% of them, the remaining ones I'm not talented enough to do ;) Some I had to leave comments requesting additional information. The list is now down to 38 bugs which includes 2 new ones that I a

[Libreoffice-qa] aufeng audio与您共享了照片

Hello,sir Aufeng audio factory mainly produce high quality microphone, mixers, speakers. we have own brand" AUFENG brand, we also produce some high quality for shure, yamaha and allen ... attached is our some factory prices, if you are interest, please contact with us soonest brent Su A

[Libreoffice-qa] Bibisect Against Version 4?

Hi All, Can we bibisect against current master? I want to get one together but wanted to verify that this can be done. Best Regards, Joel -- *Joel Madero* LibO QA Volunteer jmadero@gmail.com ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail addres

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Dailies by branch

Hi Pedro, I am with what you want. But, go in a nice way, on how to get the things are made, I think is always better. Sometimes the technicians are in their own world, and do not see how others are colaborating, and how important are all colaborations for the project. At the end the only target fo

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Dailies by branch

Michael Meeks-2 wrote > I'm sorry you're upset - apologies if we broke some workflow / links of > yours. On the other hand - asking for some new symlinks can be done more > elegantly :-) So, in your book what is really important here is that the symlinks could be better and that I was rude?

[Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla administration info - New version 4.0.0.0.beta1

Today a new Version 4.0.0.0.beta1 has been added to FDO. BSA has also been updated accordingly. Best Regards, Joel ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] 4.0 Test week/marathon Re: [...-qa] 3.7 bug hunt party ?

I think that testing from Thursday 13 to Wednesday 19th is perfectly fine and beta1 state looks promising for it. Maybe we should announce this on the user list and there's a chance we can get a few more volunteers for QA work?? Is there any plan to make a wiki page or something about the eve

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] 4.0 Test week/marathon Re: [...-qa] 3.7 bug hunt party ?

On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 12:16 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: > Why was I so careful? If you look at > http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/src/commits-libreoffice-4-0-release-4.0.0.0-alpha1-to-beta1.log > there were about 1350 commits between alpha1 and beta1. We normally have around 1

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Dailies by branch

On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 03:08 -0800, Pedro wrote: > I would sincerely like to thank TDF for totally ignoring QA people. Surely it was input from people doing QA and wanting to encourage others to do so that caused the change ? we're always trying to improve. I'm sorry if the way the change

[Libreoffice-qa] ANNOUNCE: Small change in structure of daily builds download

Hi, you might have already noticed that we slightly modified the structure of daily builds at http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ from // to // It should make it easier to find the right build because people usually are more interested into a particular version than a tinderbo

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] 4.0 Test week/marathon Re: [...-qa] 3.7 bug hunt party ?

Hi Petr, *, Petr Mladek wrote (06-12-12 12:16) Cor Nouws píše v St 05. 12. 2012 v 10:53 +0100: Beta1 build is in progress. Linux and MAC packages are even already available at http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/ I did some very basic testing yesterday and did not find any problem

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-4.0.0.0.beta1 tag created

Petr Mladek píše v St 05. 12. 2012 v 18:31 +0100: > Hi, > > there have been created the libreoffice-4.0.0.0.beta1 tag. The > corresponding official builds will be available within next few days. > > See the attached list of changes against 4.0.0.0.alpha1[*] > See also http://wiki.documentfoundati

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] 4.0 Test week/marathon Re: [...-qa] 3.7 bug hunt party ?

Cor Nouws píše v St 05. 12. 2012 v 10:53 +0100: > Hi Michael, > > Michael Meeks wrote (05-12-12 10:34) > > > So - my hope would be that our Beta1 would be of a better quality than > > previous betas out of the door :-) but lets see. > > Yep - fully agree with even such an expectation. Beta1

[Libreoffice-qa] Dailies by branch

I would sincerely like to thank TDF for totally ignoring QA people. http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Re-Dailies-by-banch-td4021883.html Although I agree that structuring the Dailies in a more user friendly is a good idea maybe the people who use it daily could be consulted... BTW is this wha

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Master builds name revisited

Hi Petr Petr Mladek wrote > I have just pushed the change for tinderboxes, see > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/contrib/buildbot/commit/?id=d2c42f2c2143c614bb74d2f9603c951d94ab32fe > I updated few tinderboxes where I had access, including the two Linux > tinderboxes with release configur

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bug Triaging Priority

Joel Madero schrieb: try to triage these bugs: Hi, I fully support this call, it's really important to find and proceed as many bugs as possible _Before_ 4.0 will be shipped. Best regards Rainer ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail ad

[Libreoffice-qa] [QA Call] Prototype Agenda on Wiki

Please add anything that you would like us to discuss. http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA_Call_Current_Agenda#Current_Agenda Regards, Joel -- *Joel Madero* LibO QA Volunteer jmadero@gmail.com ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail add

[Libreoffice-qa] Minutes - QA Call 2012/11/30

*Time Start: 1405 UTC Participants: Bjoern, Joel, Florian, Petr +Another participant was present, apologies for not getting name *Completed Action Items +BSA -Invitation to participate after submitting a bug [Rob] +Wiki -Basic triage instructions (BSA linked to this