Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Version 4.0 UNCONFIRMED bugs

2013-01-16 Thread Pedro
ape wrote > I beg of someone for look at the blocking error fdo#59128: I don't know if it's a blocking error, but it is indeed a regression. Confirmed in Bugzilla ;) Cheers, Pedro -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Version-4-0-UNCONFIRMED-bugs

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bug Status NEW but Assigned to Someone - Please Change

2013-01-16 Thread bfo
Pedro wrote > There is no point in triaging again. The QA work is done. Now only Devs > can fix or don't fix confirmed bugs. > Assigning to someone is not a good idea. It seems like that person is > going to act on the problem when in fact he/she didn't select the issue. David Tardon wrote > I th

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bug Status NEW but Assigned to Someone - Please Change

2013-01-16 Thread Joel Madero
This will most definitely be discussed during our next QA call (next Friday, 1400 UTC). If you're able to join it would be great. The process clearly needs to be clarified and possibly updated. If not, I'll follow the conversation and try to summarize them during the call. Personally my opinion:

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Version 4.0 UNCONFIRMED bugs

2013-01-16 Thread ape
I beg of someone for look at the blocking error fdo#59128: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59128 This is regression LOdev-4 only. ODT file containing formulas are exported to DOCX format is wrong. WinWord-2007 can not open this file. I think I found a new fragment of DOCX file which

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Version 4.0 UNCONFIRMED bugs

2013-01-16 Thread Pedro
jmadero wrote > Hi All, > > There are 15 bugs remaining that need to be triaged against 4.0, I'm > asking > Developer and/or QA staff to take a look at them to see if we can get this > list down. Goal is to be down to 0 by Friday but most of these are either > on platforms that I don't have or are

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.0.0.1 RC1 available

2013-01-16 Thread Pedro
Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote > Fixed since Monday: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59248 It was fixed long ago for Windows. But it doesn't work on the RC1 build https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57444 I think this is a problem because daily builds are LOdev and only RC builds

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bug Status NEW but Assigned to Someone - Please Change

2013-01-16 Thread Pedro
David Tardon wrote > I think explicitly setting a bug to ASSIGNED is pretty much pointless. > You cannot force a developer to start working on a bug just because he > has been assigned to it; on the other side, seeing that a bug is already > assigned might discourage others from taking it. Couldn

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.0.0.1 RC1 available

2013-01-16 Thread Jean-Baptiste Faure
Le 15/01/2013 12:31, Pedro a écrit : > [...] > And there is an important regressions compared to LOdev: Letter and Fax > Wizards stopped working Fixed since Monday: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59248 Best regards. JBF -- Seuls des formats ouverts peuvent assurer la pérennité de

[Libreoffice-qa] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-3.6.5.2 tag created

2013-01-16 Thread Fridrich Strba
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, there have been created the libreoffice-3.6.5.2 tag (aka rc2). The corresponding official builds will be available within next few days. See the attached list of changes against 3.6.4.3[*]. Now, you might switch your current 3-6 source tree to

[Libreoffice-qa] ATTENTION: Release 3.6.5.2 from libreoffice-3-6-5 branch

2013-01-16 Thread Fridrich Strba
Hello, good people, We had a problem with version numbes in the libreoffice-3.6.5.1 tag and also there is one additional commit in the libreoffice-3-6-5 branch that fixes a regression in 3.6.5rc1. Therefore we will tag today (rather sooner then later) 3.6.5 rc2 from the libreoffice-3-6-5 branch.