Joel Madero schrieb:
-Status clarification (New vs. Reopened)
**Agreed: *Reopened should only be used if the bug is assigned
*Because of this agreement, modifications have to be made to our current
workflow
-*Agreed: *NEEDINFO: Used only if most the information
Hi all,
just stumbled upon thes
jmadero wrote
> If you mark a bug as WFM, you are unable to go directly back to
> UNCONFIRMED - which for me
> is strange, I understand if it's marked as FIXED but WFM shouldn't block
> you from doing UNCONFIRMED again.
Hi!
Are you sure about that? See this bug activity table:
https://bugs.freed
On 01/21/2013 11:55 AM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 11:17:20AM -0500, Terrence Enger wrote:
On Fri, 2013-01-18 at 08:04 -0800, Joel Madero wrote:
Can someone triage this one? Thanks in advance!
And there has been quit a bit of subsequent discussion.
I wonder just what Lio
On 01/21/2013 07:08 AM, Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi,
On Thursday, 2013-01-17 09:43:33 -0800, Joel Madero wrote:
-*Agreed: *NEEDINFO: Used only if most the information is there and
the bug can be confirmed but additional information would be useful
Request that once information is provided, move bug
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 11:17:20AM -0500, Terrence Enger wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-01-18 at 08:04 -0800, Joel Madero wrote:
>> Can someone triage this one? Thanks in advance!
> And there has been quit a bit of subsequent discussion.
> I wonder just what Lionel was proposing [1] after the announcemen
Hi,
On Thursday, 2013-01-17 09:43:33 -0800, Joel Madero wrote:
> -*Agreed: *NEEDINFO: Used only if most the information is there and
> the bug can be confirmed but additional information would be useful
> Request that once information is provided, move bug to NEW not to
> UNCONFIRMED or REOPENED
bfo píše v Čt 17. 01. 2013 v 13:29 -0800:
> Hi!
> Please explain little more the following:
>
>
> jmadero wrote
> > -Status clarification (New vs. Reopened)
> > **Agreed: *Reopened should only be used if the bug is assigned
>
> - often Reopened status is used by the Reporters when bug is marked
Hi all,
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 01:00:53AM +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> Dear Community,
>
> The Document Foundation is pleased to announce the first release
> candidate of our upcoming LibreOffice 4.0. The 4.0 will be our fifth
> major release in just over two years, and comes with a nice set
Lionel Elie Mamane píše v So 19. 01. 2013 v 03:30 +0100:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:43:17PM +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> > I write:
>
> >> The Document Foundation is happy to announce the second release
> >> candidate of LibreOffice 3.6.5.
>
> > In case you wonder if you missed RC1 - that v
