Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ABANDONED] Restore menu File > Template

2013-03-04 Thread Joren
Op 4/03/13 23:58, Thorsten Behrens schreef: [new template dialog problems in 4.0.0] Cor Nouws wrote: Anyway's: , for the open bugs, https://bugs.freedesktop.org/query.cgi?component=filters%20and%20storage&component=framework&component=Libreoffice&component=UI&component=Writer&order=bug_id&produ

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ABANDONED] Restore menu File > Template

2013-03-04 Thread Cor Nouws
Hi, Thorsten Behrens wrote (04-03-13 23:58) [new template dialog problems in 4.0.0] thx for the look into that - as a first question (Cc QA list), is this list triaged enough for hackers to start poking at high-prio issues? I did quite some checking, rephrasing, and closing of dups. And disc

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ABANDONED] Restore menu File > Template

2013-03-04 Thread Thorsten Behrens
[new template dialog problems in 4.0.0] Cor Nouws wrote: > Anyway's: >, for the open bugs, > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/query.cgi?component=filters%20and%20storage&component=framework&component=Libreoffice&component=UI&component=Writer&order=bug_id&product=LibreOffice&query_format=advanced&quer

[Libreoffice-qa] Oldest Unconfirmed Bug - Bug 33966 - Windows installer behaves differently when run from user session and from startup script

2013-03-04 Thread Joel Madero
Hi All, This weeks oldest unconfirmed bug: *Bug 33966* - Windows installer behaves differently when run from user session and from startup script https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33966 Can someone take a stab at it? I don't have a

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Should we use the "QA Contact" field?

2013-03-04 Thread Rainer Bielefeld
Joel Madero schrieb: Hm I have mixed feelings about these requirements. Hi, if you answer to my posting 26.02.2013 21:23 you should refer to I am thinking about something very simple.

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Should we use the "QA Contact" field?

2013-03-04 Thread Petr Mladek
Joel Madero píše v Pá 01. 03. 2013 v 09:03 -0800: > > I would not enforce this but I would make it optional. By > other words, I > would take inspiration from the developers side where the > "random" names > in assigned fields just created false feeling that