Re: [Libreoffice-qa] GUI automation

Hey Vladimir, 2013/3/13 Michael Meeks : > Hi Vladimir, > > First - great to see you here :-) > > On Wed, 2013-03-13 at 16:17 +0100, Vladimir Benes wrote: >> we were discussing recently how to improve testing of LO's GUI. We found >> out that situation if more than bad. So I agree here wit

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] BUGZILLAASSISTANT broken due to   in Component names

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Op 13-03-13 08:57, Rainer Bielefeld schreef: >> I don't understand what is changed. Why do we want to go from >> spaces in a wiki to   > > > Hi Rob, > > the intended main change I did was that I corrected wrong space > encoding "%" to "%20" > <

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] BUGZILLAASSISTANT broken due to   in Component names

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi All, The BSA is updated again. - -- Greetings, Rob Snelders Op 13-03-13 19:02, Joel Madero schreef: > For the time being we may want to revert changes as currently BSA > does not have the RC on it which is a big problem for QA as we may > be miss

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] BUGZILLAASSISTANT broken due to   in Component names

For the time being we may want to revert changes as currently BSA does not have the RC on it which is a big problem for QA as we may be missing out on bug reports because of this. Best, Joel On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 1:45 AM, Rainer Bielefeld < libreoff...@bielefeldundbuss.de> wrote: > Robinson

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] GUI automation -- Dogtail test suite for Accessibility testing

Vladimir, Thanks for the Dogtail tip! It looks like in addition to doing automated testing of GUI in general, the a11y underpinning should facilitate a more systematic assessment of Accessibility and support for Assistive Technologies as implemented on the Linux builds. But that testing should

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] GUI automation -- Dogtail test suite for Accessibility testing

Vladimir, Thanks for the Dogtail tip! It looks like in addition to doing automated testing of GUI in general, the a11y underpinning should facilitate a more systematic assessment of Accessibility and support for Assistive Technologies as implemented on the Linux builds. But that testing should be

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] GUI automation

Hi Vladimir, First - great to see you here :-) On Wed, 2013-03-13 at 16:17 +0100, Vladimir Benes wrote: > we were discussing recently how to improve testing of LO's GUI. We found > out that situation if more than bad. :-) > There are several options how to approach this. The fi

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Fwd: Fwd: Bug sur Nouveau dans le BSA français!

Hi Rainer, On 13/03/2013 16:26, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: > sophie schrieb: > >> So, I've translated the file attached and the wiki page you indicated. > > Hi Sophi, > > great work! I did some smaller tests and all functions work perfect. Great thanks! > > May I suggest to use a more specific vi

[Libreoffice-qa] GUI automation

Hi all, we were discussing recently how to improve testing of LO's GUI. We found out that situation if more than bad. There are several options how to approach this. The first is LDTP [1] and the other one (in my opinion far better) is Dogtail [2]. If LO uses standard gtk widgets so they're a11

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Fwd: Fwd: Bug sur Nouveau dans le BSA français!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Rob, On 12/03/2013 22:37, Rob Snelders wrote: > Hi Sophie, > > I had emailed this last weekend. But I forgot to add you. Can you > translate the needed parts? So, I've translated the file attached and the wiki page you indicated. > > Can you als

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] BUGZILLAASSISTANT broken due to   in Component names

Robinson Tryon schrieb: If we're pulling data directly from the wiki and using it for the BSA, should we consider Protecting or semi-Protecting that wiki page? Hi, currently it's a more hypothetical problem, there are no "violations", and as you see experience (and may be permissions) is not

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] BUGZILLAASSISTANT broken due to   in Component names

On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 4:10 AM, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: > Rainer Bielefeld schrieb: > >> was necessary with oLder Wikimedia for getting some templates working. > ... > with OLDER Wikimedia, of course. > ... > (not directly related to BSA, but shows some Wikimedia vulnerabilities). Just to be cle

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] BUGZILLAASSISTANT broken due to   in Component names

On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 3:57 AM, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: >> I don't understand what is changed. Why do we want to go from spaces in >> a wiki to   > > ... > I corrected wrong space encoding > "%" to "%20" >

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] BUGZILLAASSISTANT broken due to   in Component names

Rainer Bielefeld schrieb: And after that I added a new mistake with the " " due to obsolete private notes (without thinking about them), some (long) time ago that was necessary with oLder Wikimedia for getting some templates working. Hi, with OLDER Wikimedia, of course. And I will have to do

[Libreoffice-qa] BUGZILLAASSISTANT broken due to   in Component names

I don't understand what is changed. Why do we want to go from spaces in a wiki to   Hi Rob, the intended main change I did was that I corrected wrong space encoding "%" to "%20" With that wrong e