Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Stagnant NEEDINFO bugs

2013-04-16 Thread Rainer Bielefeld
Hi, just for the records: More or less with the beginning of April, I started to check Stagnant NEEDINFO bugs without change for more than 6 months where I am involved. My goal is to handle at least 5 bugs per week. Statistics 2013-04-17 Number Percent comment

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Triaging Goals - Net Minus 10 per Day Against Version 4

2013-04-16 Thread Joel Madero
Thanks to the great work of our team, some help from devs, and a couple new people along the way, we're now down to 162 bugs, down nearly 30 just in the past 36 hours. Many of the remaining 162 are quite complicated so any input from devs, advanced users, etc... greatly appreciated. Also some req

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Triaging Goals - Net Minus 10 per Day Against Version 4

2013-04-16 Thread Joel Madero
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Marc Kaulisch wrote: > Hi guys, > > I started to go through this list and I can confirm four bugs (see below) > where formatting is lost when documents are saved in .doc format. > Somehow we still have a problem with this file format which is still a > very often

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Triaging Goals - Net Minus 10 per Day Against Version 4

2013-04-16 Thread Marc Kaulisch
Hi guys, I started to go through this list and I can confirm four bugs (see below) where formatting is lost when documents are saved in .doc format. Somehow we still have a problem with this file format which is still a very often used one. I have not looked for duplicates, but my guess is th

[Libreoffice-qa] fdo#61189 - Printer Bug Triage Needed - Office PS Laser Printer Required

2013-04-16 Thread Joel Madero
Another one of those really specific bugs that need triaged. Someone using LibreOffice in an office setting should be able to triage this one but you'll need a office quality PS printer (ie. no cheap ink jet will do the trick). https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61189 Thanks in adv

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] XP Tester Needed for Several Bugs

2013-04-16 Thread Kieran Peckett
On 15 April 2013 23:12, Pedro wrote: > Hi Kieran > > > Kieran Peckett wrote > > On XP here - is there a search to limit bugs to XP only? > > Are you crazyskeggy in Bugzilla? > Yes, I am > > I reopened Bug #62089 because I can replicate the bug if I replicate the > submitter's conditions i.e. s

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Enhancements - Getting User Input

2013-04-16 Thread V Stuart Foote
Robinson Tryon wrote > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 4:35 AM, Petr Mladek < > pmladek@ > > wrote: > Right now we don't have any voting and (essentially) no visible input > from the users as to what should be fixed first. I believe that Joel > told me that the devs *kind of* look at the bug stats, # of

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Enhancements - Getting User Input

2013-04-16 Thread Robinson Tryon
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 4:35 AM, Petr Mladek wrote: > I am afraid that this could not work easily. If we do the work and > select 10-15 nice features and find potential volunteers, we probably do > not need voting. There will be most likely different volunteers for the > different features. ok, i

[Libreoffice-qa] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-4.0.3.1 tag created

2013-04-16 Thread Petr Mladek
Hi, there have been created the libreoffice-4.0.3.1 tag, aka rc1. The corresponding official builds will be available within next few days. See the attached list of changes against 4.0.2.2. Now, you might switch your current 4-0 source tree to it using: ./g fetch --tags ./g checkout -b tag-lib

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Enhancements - Getting User Input

2013-04-16 Thread Petr Mladek
Joel Madero píše v Po 15. 04. 2013 v 11:20 -0700: > > > Also we don't need a new system for the voting, we already > have the bugzilla. > > > Currently we don't use bugzilla voting, also it is a big problem if > the #1 enhancement request is some crazy request that takes

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Lifecycle of builds?

2013-04-16 Thread Petr Mladek
Robinson Tryon píše v Po 15. 04. 2013 v 11:21 -0400: > > BTW: ESC has had nothing against the one month after the last planned > > release. If you update the wiki pages with the dates that would be cool. > > Great! Pages are now updated. I think we're basically done with our > EOL Action Item now.