Re: [Libreoffice-qa] After EOL has been reached...

2013-04-26 Thread Jean-Baptiste Faure
Hi, Le 19/04/2013 23:21, Robinson Tryon a écrit : Per discussion at the meeting today, we generally agreed to the following: AGREED: For users inquiring about tech support after the EOL date of a release, we politely indicate that the release is EOL and ask them to upgrade to a new version

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] After EOL has been reached...

2013-04-26 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi, On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 09:47:28AM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: Le 19/04/2013 23:21, Robinson Tryon a écrit : Per discussion at the meeting today, we generally agreed to the following: AGREED: For users inquiring about tech support after the EOL date of a release, we politely

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] After EOL has been reached...

2013-04-26 Thread Robinson Tryon
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 5:24 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 09:47:28AM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: Le 19/04/2013 23:21, Robinson Tryon a écrit : AGREED: We de-list versions in Bugzilla 6 months after the release has been EOLed I

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] After EOL has been reached...

2013-04-26 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:56:21AM -0400, Robinson Tryon wrote: This kind of scenario is one of the reasons I was interested in implementing my Repro Table. The current version drop-down is both too long and not granular enough to visually indicate the NOREPRO in 3.6.2 rc1 and the REPRO in

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] After EOL has been reached...

2013-04-26 Thread Robinson Tryon
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:56:21AM -0400, Robinson Tryon wrote: This kind of scenario is one of the reasons I was interested in implementing my Repro Table. The current version drop-down is both too long

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] After EOL has been reached...

2013-04-26 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi, On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:26:33AM -0400, Robinson Tryon wrote: On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:56:21AM -0400, Robinson Tryon wrote: This kind of scenario is one of the reasons I was interested in

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] After EOL has been reached...

2013-04-26 Thread Robinson Tryon
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote: So, as a developer, I would think comments (and the platform field) would be sufficient for these rare cornercases. For fixed and reappearing, I think its not really an issue: - if the bug is really

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] After EOL has been reached...

2013-04-26 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi Robinson, On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:54:05PM -0400, Robinson Tryon wrote: I don't know if an easier-to-read interface would increase our ability to attract users to join us and help us retain people as members of the QA Team, but it is one of the things I thought about when making a

[Libreoffice-qa] Looking for a new approach in QA workflow.

2013-04-26 Thread MiguelAngel
Hi all, Reading comments out there, like Ask, Bugzilla and other sites, seems some people have the impression that LibreOffice is released with bugs, what leaves secondly the great improvements, what do not make me feel too well. Well IMHO, we need to look for a new approach to change this