Hi All,
Are there any concerns about us moving bug report wiki to the QA section?
We don't want to make the change if it'll ruin someone's workflow but it
seems like the info on the page could be argued to fall under QA :)
Best,
Joel
--
*Joel Madero*
LibreOffice QA Volunteer
* Present:
+ Hangout: Thorsten, Bjoern, Joel, Michael M, Markus, Andras, Petr
+ Phone: Stephan, Cedric, Ahmad, Caolan, Eike, Kendy
* Completed Action items:
+ kill calc / inherited number formatting for 4.1 (Markus)
[ already in as of last week ]
+
Hi all QAers
A very interesting reading
http://www.robweir.com/blog/2013/06/the-power-of-brand-and-the-power-of-product-part-2.html
Kind regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Food-for-thought-tp4061338.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive
Not sure I'd exactly consider Rob's musings as unbiased.
Kind of an apples and oranges comparison, truth be told the public persona
of Apache Open Office is still based on a 12 month old release (r1351645).
Relatively bug free, but remains feature poor compared to the AOO
development builds.
V Stuart Foote wrote
Not sure I'd exactly consider Rob's musings as unbiased.
I'm well aware of Rob's bias. However assuming the bias is in the analysis
and not in the values, there are some interesting results.
V Stuart Foote wrote
In that time frame LibreOffice has issued I think 15 timed
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 04:11:57PM -0700, Pedro wrote:
I'm well aware of Rob's bias. However assuming the bias is in the analysis
and not in the values, there are some interesting results.
Thats a bold assumption -- I wouldnt go that far. If those numbers would be
really relevant, we
