On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Sophie wrote:
>> I would like to receive some
>> explanations about faggots and snitches in its public-faced parts
>> being the QA community.
>
> What sort of answer do you expect? You want us to escalate on non sense?
OK sophie, I'm convinced...
As I said before
Gerry T. wrote
> While the rendering quality of EPS in LO 4.0/4.1 was 'production
> quality', the rendering in 4.2 & 4.3 regressed and is unusable for
> publishing.
It may be that there is a regression, but as pointed out in comment 4 and in
this report:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cg
op 30-07-14 19:38, Urmas schreef:
Interesting things happen in LO QA community.
Instead of reading 4.3 release notes, as an adequate person would, "Jay
Philips" in comment 15 starts being rude (and authoritative) to me, which I —knowing
about the dreck open source generally attracts— can loo
Hi Urmas, all,
Le 30/07/2014 19:38, Urmas a écrit :
> Interesting things happen in LO QA community.
>
> Instead of reading 4.3 release notes, as an adequate person would,
> "Jay Philips" in comment 15 starts being rude (and authoritative) to
> me, which I —knowing about the dreck open source gener
Hi Urmas,
I'm not going to discuss the content of the bug itself. I'd like to
discuss some other things:
First of all: thanks for just bringing this to the list, instead of play
cat and mouse in Bugzilla which result in a huge spam.
Secondly, I'm not sure how you even can ask for an officia
I suggest everyone ignore this
On 07/30/2014 10:38 AM, Urmas wrote:
> Interesting things happen in LO QA community.
>
> Instead of reading 4.3 release notes, as an adequate person would, "Jay
> Philips" in comment 15 starts being rude (and authoritative) to me, which I
> —knowing about the dreck
Interesting things happen in LO QA community.
Instead of reading 4.3 release notes, as an adequate person would, "Jay
Philips" in comment 15 starts being rude (and authoritative) to me, which I
—knowing about the dreck open source generally attracts— can look over; but
than he snitches me over
Great job, guys !
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 10:58 PM, Tommy wrote:
>
> just to say that the count is now 699
>
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/report.cgi?y_axis_field=bug_
> status&query_format=report-table&product=LibreOffice&
> format=table&action=wrap
>
>
> some nice chart:
> https://bugs.freed
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 09:58:56PM +0200, Tommy wrote:
> just to say that the count is now 699
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/report.cgi?y_axis_field=bug_status&query_format=report-table&product=LibreOffice&format=table&action=wrap
> great job QA team!!!
Indeed, congratulations everyone!
Just bef
Hi all,
Just a note that 4.3.0.4 or final is missing on BSA.
Cheers
Sophie
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problem
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 08:27:31 +0200, Christian Lohmaier
wrote:
Hi Tommy,
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 7:06 AM, Tommy wrote:
I received the release announcement of 4.2.6
You saw an announcement for the rc2 - i.e. it is available on the
prereleases page.
http://www.libreoffice.org/download/pre-r
Hi Jay, all,
Le 30/07/2014 02:09, Jay Philips a écrit :
> Hi Joel,
>
> Well the UX team is already CCed in the bug report and i guess they will
> get around to it whenever they do, which i assume will take a while.
> Have my fingers crossed that some portions of the proposal lands in
> master or t
12 matches
Mail list logo
