On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Dan Lewis elderdanle...@gmail.com wrote:
There was a bug (regression) involving Base first appearing in 4.0.0
and fixed in 4.3.2.1. My question: will the bug fix be back ported to 4.2.7?
If not, then Base 4.2.7 is not of much use to anyone with complex
Good morning Dan, *,
On Sa, 4. Oktober 2014 13:52 Dan Lewis wrote:
On 10/03/2014 09:42 AM, Thomas Hackert wrote:
while configuring my freshly downloaded and parallel installed
(following the instructions from
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Installing_in_parallel) LO
master on Debian
On 10/05/2014 03:48 AM, Andras Timar wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Dan Lewis elderdanle...@gmail.com wrote:
There was a bug (regression) involving Base first appearing in 4.0.0
and fixed in 4.3.2.1. My question: will the bug fix be back ported to 4.2.7?
If not, then Base 4.2.7 is
Dan, *,
Lionel would need to comment, but with just the final bug-fix release pending,
IMHO it is not going to make it into 4.2
Suspect this is one of those issues that really can not, and should not be back
ported--as simply too much of the infrastructure in base changed between 4.2
and
There I was, feeling so proud of myself for doing buzilla searches
*before* typing up a description and collecting screen images and so
forth. But then the automatic search for duplicates when I entered my
summary tuned up fdo#84591 split menu closes style dropdown.
My bugzilla query
Hi Dan,
Here are three bug report numbers: 72696, 82150, 82720. The first
of these was mine and based upon 4.2.0.0 beta 2. (Bug 82151 is similar
and has a list of 8 duplicate bug reports.)
Have you tested it with LO 4.2.7.1? I have downloaded the attached
database of bug 72696. Have
On 10/05/2014 11:56 AM, Robert Großkopf wrote:
Hi Dan,
Here are three bug report numbers: 72696, 82150, 82720. The first
of these was mine and based upon 4.2.0.0 beta 2. (Bug 82151 is similar
and has a list of 8 duplicate bug reports.)
Have you tested it with LO 4.2.7.1? I have
@Terry,
Not just you, I ran your query multiple times same result, and then realized
what it was.
It is subtle, as it looks the same--but the Description of an attachment is
actually not tagged as a Comment for use in query. It has its own field
Attachment description that can only be used from
Hi,
The query might be case sensitive :)
Liebe Grüße, / Yours,
Florian Reisinger
Am 05.10.2014 um 17:21 schrieb Terrence Enger ten...@iseries-guru.com:
There I was, feeling so proud of myself for doing buzilla searches
*before* typing up a description and collecting screen images and so
On Sun, 2014-10-05 at 18:25 +0200, Florian Reisinger wrote:
Hi,
The query might be case sensitive :)
At least one of the selectable criteria is explicit: contains
the string (exact case). So I assume that that criteria are
case-insensitive if they do not say anything.
Meanwhile, I think
10 matches
Mail list logo
