Hello,
On 1/4/23 16:00, Mike Kaganski wrote:
On 01.04.2023 16:45, Mike Kaganski wrote:
2. I believe we can just have *major* releases, without point
releases. I.e., 3.3.0.4; 3.4.0.1; 3.5.0.3; 3.6.0.4; 4.0.0.0.beta1; ...
Because when we bibisect, we do it to do the following bisection in
the
Hello,
On 3/4/23 9:11, Mike Kaganski wrote:
Why? What is the upside of having them
The upside is that it's easier to identify when a regression was introduced.
If the repo just has one release closest to the branch point, then there
are thousands of commits between each release. However, if
On 03.04.2023 9:55, Xisco Fauli wrote:
2. I believe we can just have *major* releases, without point
releases. I.e., 3.3.0.4; 3.4.0.1; 3.5.0.3; 3.6.0.4; 4.0.0.0.beta1; ...
Because when we bibisect, we do it to do the following bisection in
the specific repo; so the branch point is the only int
