Hello, Robinson.
1. From Wiki:
> The default text layout is Left-to-Right, so we don't both using a "text:rtl"
> tag, as that would be silly.
Could you explain the sentence more clearly? Is it mean not to use
both text:rtl and text:ctl?
2. Should we use any of the tags for problems with top-t
Hello, Joel and team.
2015-08-25 21:05 GMT+03:00 Joel Madero :
> Versions Covered:
> Windows - any bug 4.3 - master (inclusive);
Here (https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bibisect/Windows#win32-5.0)
the oldest version is 4.5.0.0.alpha0 + Build ID:
57d6b92b69a31260dea0d84fcd1fc5866ada7adb.
Wh
Thank you, Stephan. I have added the information to the wiki.
Best regards,
Alexandr
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-
Hello.
Usually I use Valgrind with command:
$ valgrind [parameters] program
With LibreOffice another variant is possible
(https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/BugReport/Debug_Information):
$ soffice --valgrind
What is the difference between these variants? How to use valgrind
parameters with
Hello.
I believe that it is a good idea to check old bugs.
2014-10-16 23:00 GMT+04:00 bfoman :
> Tommy wrote
> If they see the bug has gone they should mark as WORKSFORME
> if bug persist they should drop a note and leave status UNCHANGED
> if nobody answers we do nothing and leave status UNCHANG
Hello.
Is it a good idea to use filter:xxx whiteboard tag for bugs with
images? For other media?
Best regards,
Alexandr
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedeskto
Hello.
> Is useful expecially in Italy. Our Public Administrations use a lot of rtf
> files for their workflow
> and we have a lot of problem with this orrible file format. :(
> Often the bug report doesn't contain the whiteboard tag or the description is
> not so clear.
> so, a meta is useful f
Hello.
>> Some weeks ago there was a discussion about whiteboard, but
>> information in wiki is incomplete. For example, I can not find
>> information about such statuses as filter:doc or filter:rtf.
> Indeed I see them missing ;) Good thing about wiki is that anyone can update
> it :-D The filte
Hello.
Some weeks ago there was a discussion about whiteboard, but
information in wiki is incomplete. For example, I can not find
information about such statuses as filter:doc or filter:rtf. Also I
see both “filter:rtf” and “rtf_filter” for some bugs which seems to be
the same. Could somebody upda
Hello.
> I'm confirming your bug list... ;)
> JFYI, there's a metabug (fdo#81234) for filter:rtf or rtf_filter ;)
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81234
Is this metabug really usefull if we have whiteboard tag "filter:rtf"?
Best regards,
Alexandr
___
Hello.
Sometimes I meet a situation, when a bug was confirmed for old
LibreOffice version but can not be reproduced in new one. In
QA/Bugzilla/FAQ
(https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/FAQ#How_to_terminate_a_Bug_if_it_can.27t_be_reproduced_any_longer)
it is written:
“If a bug has been
Hello,
I am trying to recheck old bugs. I met a problem with bug 44596 -
TABLE: Wrong (unuseable) table rendering from Word document
(https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44596). My sreenshot in
MS Word 2007 and bugreporter's one differs much. Can somebody try to
open the testfile in MS Wo
Hello.
Are daily builds of LibreOffice 4.2 for Linux available anywhere or
building them yourself is the only way?
Best regards,
Alexandr
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: ht
13 matches
Mail list logo
