Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LibreOffice Online and Collabora Online demos for TDF members and contributors

Hello Thomas, On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Thomas Hackert wrote: > Where should we report bugs found in LOOL? In our Bugzilla, here on > this list or somewhere else? > Have a nice afternoon > Thomas. > Please report LOOL bugs in TDF Bugzilla. There is the LibreOffice Online product/project .

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] What to do with many files

e documents, and reduce the number of files, because I doubt that they exhibit 1000 independent, unrelated bugs. It is enough to submit one document for a specific bug. Best regards, Andras Timar ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreo

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Fw: findings from the plugfest

On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > Hi guys, > > below a list of question / issues with the ODF support - any > volunteers to convert those not being obvious test or ODF standard bugs > into bugzilla reports? I reported at least two during the plugfest: https://bugs.docum

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Minutes of ESC call: 2015-11-19

Hi, On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > * Release Engineering update (Cloph) > + 4.4.7 RC2 - due next week > + patches waiting for 4.4 and 4.4.7, please review until Monday I forgot to mention, that there is a patch of mine in the queue. https://gerrit.libreoffic

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Collabora LibreOffice Vanilla QA on OSX

Hi Alex, On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Alexander Thurgood wrote: > Le 23/06/2015 20:17, Andras Timar a écrit : > > > Hi all, > > For the consequences of the build switches, as I understand them, see > below : Generally, you can read configure.ac for the meaning of bui

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Collabora LibreOffice Vanilla QA on OSX

Hi Alex, On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 7:11 AM, Alex Thurgood wrote: > Le 23/06/2015 20:17, Andras Timar a écrit : > > Hi Andras, > > Wow, thanks for the build switches, good to know. > > Seeing as both Java and Python are disabled, as are most of the > (optional) extensions,

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Collabora LibreOffice Vanilla QA on OSX

Hi, On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Robinson Tryon wrote: > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Alexander Thurgood > wrote: >> Le 23/06/2015 15:21, Robinson Tryon a écrit : >>> How differently is it built? My understanding is that it's pretty >>> close, but I haven't had a chance to really delve

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bibisect Requests

On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 1:37 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 5:52 PM, wrote: >> Quoting "Norbert Thiebaud" : >> >>> I've also put together a 'sample of a bibisect for Windows >>> git://gerrit.libreoffice.org/bibisect-win32-5.0 >>> about 400MB >> >> >> I have cloned the repo

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Windows dev please evaluate my ProposedEasyHack

On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 05:00:19PM +, Michael Meeks wrote: >> * Pending Action Items: >> + please file an Easy-Hack this week: just a bug with whiteboard: (All) >> "EasyHack DifficultyBeginner SkillCpp TopicCleanup" >

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Keyword "bisected"

Hi Joel, On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Joel Madero wrote: > Hi All, > > I just found out that this keyword "bisected" is being used. I'm curious > who is using it and what it is identifying. Also, I'm curious if we > shouldn't move whatever it is being used for to the whiteboard - having > 2 bi

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Windows master daily builds stuck to nov 12

Hi, On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Tommy wrote: > hi, is there any reason why I can't find a 4.4.x daily build after 12th > november? > http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/ > > all the tinderbox are stuck to that date > I guess you mean the Windows tinderboxes only. It is a known pr

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.2.7 RC1 test builds available

On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Dan Lewis wrote: > > There was a bug (regression) involving Base first appearing in 4.0.0 > and fixed in 4.3.2.1. My question: will the bug fix be back ported to 4.2.7? > If not, then Base 4.2.7 is not of much use to anyone with complex forms. > FYI: it involve

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANNOUNCE] Branch libreoffice-4-3-2 and Tag libreoffice-4.3.2.1 created

Hi Robinson, You have not created libreoffice-4-3-2 branches on help, dictionaries and translation submodules. Regards, Andras On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > Hi all, > > The tag libreoffice-4.3.2.1 (AKA 4.3.2 RC1) and the corresponding > branch libreoffice-4-3-2 h

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Minutes of ESC call: 2014-08-07

On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > + help Cloph with the quickstarter disabling (Andras) > + Windows quickstarter status > https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/10669/ > + checkbox in the installer seems to cause problems :-( > + reverted the

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LIbreOffice 4.3.0 Beta2 available

On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Robinson Tryon wrote: > On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Andras Timar wrote: >> If you do "parallel install", then you have to install MSVC runtime on your >> own. >> http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=30679

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LIbreOffice 4.3.0 Beta2 available

On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Pedro wrote: > Performing a Parallel Install of LO43 Beta2 under Windows XP Pro SP3 en_US > x86 returns > > https://www.dropbox.com/s/lrumjkpjwah1tdz/Screenshot%202014-06-06%2015.49.50.png > > If you do "parallel install", then you have to install MSVC runtime on

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] new mab4.4 page and last (die hard) mab4.1

Hi, On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 6:34 AM, Tommy wrote: > hi QA guys, > I've created a new mab4.4 page at > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79641 > moreover I ask confirmation of the last surviving mab4.1 at > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59613 so we can finally close > that

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] last surviving mab4.0

> Bug 59613 - RTL VIEWING: Increasing size of dialogs to right or bottom > causes artifacts > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59613 > This one is still there in 4.1 and 4.2. BTW you can test RTL with en-US builds, if you set the SAL_RTL_ENABLED environment variable. Best regards, And

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LO 4.2 RC1 (aka 4.2.0.1)

Hi, On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Pedro wrote: > Hi all > > As I have mentioned several times during Alpha development (and never got > any answer, as usual) the 4.2 installer under Windows no longer offers the > option to select which Modules to install during a Custom install. > > Was this a

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Grammar check does not work, when there is no spellcheck in a document

On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Pedro wrote: > Thomas Hackert wrote >> Hi again, >> "sigh" ... It seems, either I expect too unexpected things from LO, >> or the grammar check is not usable at all ... :( But if I switch my >> UI settings to en-US, I can write something completely rubbish, and >> t

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] qtz (key-ID) builds with two entries "Language Settings" in "Tools - Options" dialog

On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Sophie wrote: > Le 02/12/2013 17:12, Thomas Hackert a écrit : >> Hi @ll, >> as I tried to find a string in the UI, I switched LO to the UI >> language "key-ID" (with installed qtz lang- as well as helppack). >> After restarting LO I opened "3LxCd||Tools – cVAJp||Opt

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] New "Live Data Streams" OLH links to empty wiki help page

On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Thomas Hackert wrote: > Hello @ll, > as I try to translate the new "Live Data Streams" dialog, I wanted > to read the OLH for it. But for some reason it tries to open > http://help.libreoffice.org/sdatabase/modules/scalc/ui/datastreams/url. LibreOffice could not r

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Colour "[]" in LibreLogo's "Area Style / Filling"

Hi, On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Thomas Hackert wrote: > Hello Sophie, *, > On Dienstag, 26. November 2013 18:32 Sophie wrote: >> Le 26/11/2013 18:28, Thomas Hackert a écrit : >>> On Dienstag, 26. November 2013 17:43 Sophie wrote: Le 26/11/2013 16:53, Thomas Hackert a écrit : >>> >

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Missing letters in Basic OLH on »"/" operator (mathematical)« with Master build

Hi Thomas, On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Thomas Hackert wrote: > . All the last letter/numbers are missing there ... :( Is it > intended? Of course, not. It is a bug. Please report it, and cc Stephan Bergmann, because he worked on the syntax highlighter 5 days ago, and I suspect that this ch

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Why no daily master builds

On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Pedro wrote: > Tinderbox #39 manages to produce Windows binaries most days (even if they do > not work in Windows XP) so it must be doing something right :) Yes, because it builds with --disable-odk. Regards, Andras ___

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Why no daily master builds

Hi Pedro, On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Pedro wrote: > I believe it must be related to the fact that many of the tinderboxes (e.g. > Tinderbox #6, the only one producing binaries for all Windows versions) were > run by Suse staff and Suse has dropped LO development > (https://people.gnome.org

[Libreoffice-qa] WikiHelp update

Hi, For your information, I uploaded LibreOffice 4.1 help pages to http://help.libreoffice.org today (including localizations). Best regards, Andras ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change set

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] URGENT Cherry pick regressions to next release

On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Pedro wrote: > Here is an example that will cause DATA LOSS for any user of 4.1.0 (it was > cherry picked to 4.1.1) > > https://bugassistant.libreoffice.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66420 > > I believe this should be a QUALITY rule. It is in the review queue for 4.1.0: htt

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Test the Photo Album Creator

On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Pedro wrote: > Samuel Mehrbrodt-2 wrote >> Also this doesn't have a help page yet. Where is the right place to >> request one? > > Help page is with the Documentation folks... > http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Documentation-f1645240.html I don't recall that D

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: > * Pending Action Items > + drop the unused xmerge filters, but retain the framework (Timar) In fact, it's completed. Cheers, Andras ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address:

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] installing 400rc2 parallel on Windows - no way to choose extensions ?

Hi, On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 10:59 PM, V Stuart Foote wrote: > Andras, > > So as per the Installing_in_parallel Wiki > > to install a parallel instance, should we be setting a WRITEREGSITRY=0 when > doing the co

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] installing 400rc2 parallel on Windows - no way to choose extensions ?

Hi Rainer, On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: > Andras Timar schrieb: > > >> Yes, it is. With msiexec /a you convert the install kit from one >> format to another. It is not an installation > > > > Hi, > > Yes, but I wonder what can

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] installing 400rc2 parallel on Windows - no way to choose extensions ?

Hi Cor, On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Cor Nouws wrote: > Hi, > > As not regular Windows user, I hit a problem with installing 400rc2. > I use parallel installation (1) > > After " msiexec /a LibreOffice_4.0.0.2_Win_x81.msi " > I can give the path, but do not have the option to choose which

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] how to Build a locale with my own *.po

Hi, On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 8:54 AM, jinl...@nfs.iscas.ac.cn wrote: > > I have my own source(*.po) for a certain locale. Is it ok if I just put the > source to the "translation modules" and rebuild the source to get my own > build? > You need to configure --with-lang=xxx, where xxx is your langu

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Blocker Bug Reported Against 4 - Windows Custom Install Fails

Hi, On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Joel Madero wrote: > Hi All, > > This is an urgent one as we are starting our test week, can someone with > Windows see if they can reproduce: > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58275 > > If we can, we'll have to come up with a plan as it may pre

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Crystal reports RTF missing picture and wrong pagination

Hi there, On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 6:42 PM, vlakov wrote: > LibreOffice is great. It is very nice to have free Office suite. Thank you > for your effort. > But for now it is unusable for us. What worked in the past in OpenOffice now > it is broken altogether in LibreOffice. We use OpenOffice that

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 3.6.2 RC2 test builds available

Hi Micheal, 2012/9/27 Michael Meeks : > Hi Andras, > > On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 15:45 +0200, Andras Timar wrote: >> I am going to fix it over the weekend. But in case the fix does not get >> into 3.6 branch in time, a simple workaround is to add --disable-gtk to >> the co

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 3.6.2 RC2 test builds available

Hi Pedro, 2012/9/27 Pedro : > Hi all > > I'm installing RC2 > > Why is "GNOME integration" selected by default on the Windows installer? > What does it do? Should it even show on the Windows installer? > It is an empty feature, it does not install anything. However, it is annoying that we have it

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Closing FIXED bugs

Hi, 2012/9/25 Richard : > Then our criteria are misplaced? > If bugs are not to be CLOSED but only RESOLVED; > then we need to change our search and triage methods? The fact is that there are 4628 RESOLVED LibreOffice bugs in Bugzilla. IMHO QA manpower could be used better, than to check and clos

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Closing FIXED bugs

Hi, 2012/9/23 Olivier Hallot : > Hi > > I have a set of fdo bugs I opened, that are already FIXED and some of > them long time ago. Is it ok to CLOSE them? If not, what are the > criteria for closing them? Personally I dislike CLOSE-ing bugs after they are RESOLVED, it generates extra bugmail wit

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Esc Call Notes

2012/9/13 Joel Madero : > There are 30ish students from Hungary (I believe?) doing development, asked > for more EasyHacks to work on, I suggested that maybe they could help triage > and maybe find their own EasyHacks (not sure what the result of this was) There have been 13 since last year (not 3

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 3.6.0 ALPHA1 test builds available

2012/6/8 Michael Meeks : > > On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 00:36 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 10:45:51AM -0700, Pedro wrote: >> > Does "Bad luck" mean "Tough luck for Windows 2000 users because we are not >> > even going to try to fix that"? >> >> Also please consider yourself

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 3.6.0 ALPHA1 test builds available

2012/6/6 Pedro : > FYI the new About box does not show up on Windows 2000. > Yeah, it is a 3 x 10 pixel object on Windows 2000. At least it can be closed with Alt+F4. Bad luck. Andras ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-q

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call...

2012/5/24 Caolán McNamara : > * QA update (Rainer) >        + best builds for windows testing to get backtraces ? >                + use bytemark box builds, tinderbox #20 On Windows, symbols are not embedded in executables but they are in separate .pdb files. Please zip *.pdb from solver together

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [libreoffice-projects] [ANN] LibreOffice 3.5.1 RC1 available

2012.02.27. 14:31 keltezéssel, Volker Merschmann írta: There are some duplicate entries in the options menu for Writer here, installed in german on Windows XP32. One localized, one in english, for Mailmerge, Compatibility and AutoCaption. Thanks for the bug report, it is really annoying. I know

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] RC3 released as Final version???

Hi, 2012/2/15 Petr Mladek : > 4. Always omit the human readable "rcX" and distinguish the builds >   another way, .e.g. by the tag number 3.x.y.z. > >   Will this be enough for QA people? > > > 5. Wait if real users complain. > >   Olav says, that they already complain? > > > I prefer the 4th solu

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] Referencing bugs in commits

2012/2/14 Ivan Timofeev : > On 14.02.2012 19:31, Michael Meeks wrote: >> >> >> On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 16:16 +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote: >>> >>> Markus has implemented a nice feature that should help keeping the bugs >>> up to date: whenever you are committing / pushing to git, and you >> >> >>    

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LO 3.5.0.rc3 : deployment, gpo, msi, vc2008, etc.

2012/2/8 Cor Nouws : > Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote (08-02-12 06:27) > > >> Thank you for investigate that problem. Bug report is here : >> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45750 > > > I would say that it is great that this bug surfaces now! > Because I would not expect, nor advise, that a

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LO 3.5.0.rc3 : deployment, gpo, msi, vc2008, etc.

Hi, 2012/2/7 Jean-Baptiste Faure : > Hi all, > > In the FR community, several users said that it is impossible to deploy > LO 3.5.0 rc[1|2|3] under MS-Windows-7 using GPO. > > Did some of you try to do that ? > It seems that there is a problem with the fact that the redistributable > vc2008 is inc

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Blocker in 3.5.0Beta3?

Hi Pedro, 2012/1/29 Pedro : > Hi Andras, all > > > Andras Timar-3 wrote >> >>     Why don't you remove en-US language files from the install set, if you >>     don't need them? IS1033=0? >> > > This might be a good workaround but it is not a sol

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Blocker in 3.5.0Beta3?

Hi Olivier, 2012/1/29 Olivier Hallot : > The installation dialogs are now in pt-BR, which is fine. > > However, in a customized installation (where I removed tons of useless > dictionaries), the user interface of the first invokation is in English > and not in pt-BR. > > This is a serious issue an

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Blocker in 3.5.0Beta3?

Hi, 2012/1/18 Pedro : > Hi all > > While installing LO 3.5.0Beta3 today in my Win XP Home x86 pt-PT netbook I > noticed that the installer only starts in Portuguese for a brief second and > then switches to English. > > I had never tried a 3.5.x build in that netbook and after quickly testing > wi

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [Libreoffice] Call for LO-3.5.0-beta1 pre-tag testing

2011/12/11 Fridrich Strba : > On 10/12/11 07:34, Petr Mladek wrote: >> >> The 64-bit build for few localizations is being uploaded at >> >> http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/Linux_x86_64_Release_Configuration/libreoffice-3-5/ >> >> It is built the same way like the 32-bit build, see above. We

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Call for LO-3.5.0-beta1 pre-tag testing

2011/12/9 Pedro Lino : > > I uninstalled it sometime later and found all these leftovers > http://db.tt/GbdTzk0y > You use your Windows with an administrator account. It is not recommended, however I know that many people do this. Therefore LibreOffice can write into its own Program Files folder.

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [Libreoffice] Naming builds. Please???

Hi Pedro 2011/12/3 Pedro Lino : > Hi Andras > > Thank you for your quick and enlightening reply! > >> LibreOffice 3.5 will not unpack anything to desktop. But we can't >> change the past... :) > > Fair enough :) > >> You can check what's included and what's not, when you visit >> for example >> h

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [Libreoffice] Naming builds. Please???

Hi Pedro, 2011/12/3 Pedro Lino : > Hi all > > This is my final request about this subject. > > Can you please make some sense out of the version naming convention? > > I was about to reinstall version 3.4.4 (after it was overwritten by > 3.5.0 Beta0) and I already had an unpacked install folder on