On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 12:24:30PM +0200, Sophia Schroeder wrote:
>Great! :-D
>
>But shouldn't be there a 5-4-0 branch now?
Not for .0s:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/5.4#5.4.0_release
Regards,
Rene
___
List Name: Libreoffic
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 09:52:15AM -0700, V Stuart Foote wrote:
> But perusing the code showed it had only been done to distinguish the 64-bit
> Windows builds. [1] Hmm, maybe I need to spend more time in Linux sessions.
>
> Anyhow, Michael M.'s suggested easy hack looks to provide hooks for
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 01:16:14PM +0100, M Henri Day wrote:
> Assuming that the logic that Stuart mentioned for LibreOffice under
> Windows
> also applies to Linux (it should) then since your LibreOffice reports
> "Version: 5.1.1.2" it is the 32bit (x86) version (otherwise it w
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 01:16:14PM +0100, M Henri Day wrote:
>Thanks for your speedy reply, Pedro ! My Linux Mint 17.3-version is, on
>the contrary, a 64-bit version, which I could confirm by running uname -a
>in a terminal, as seen below :
>
>Linux XX 4.2.0-
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 07:50:56PM -0400, Robinson Tryon wrote:
> The build dependencies package on *buntu doesn't include gstreamer
> stuff.
This is not true. It does.
> sudo apt-get install libgstreamer0.10-dev libgstreamer-plugins-base0.10-dev
Just not the obsolete 0.10 but 1.0.
Regard
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 09:39:24PM +0200, Cor Nouws wrote:
> > Apologies for the delay with RC1. Cloph's been helping me to get up to
> > speed with all of the release engineering pieces, and I've been asking
> > a lot of questions :-) AFAIK the RC1 should be out on the public
> > mirrors, but
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:24:35PM +0200, Cor Nouws wrote:
> Robinson Tryon wrote on 18-09-14 22:47:
>
> > For the upcoming new version 4.3.2 the builds for RC2 are now
> > available on pre-releases.
>
> I've missed the RC1 on our Dutch public pre-releases site
> http://nl.libreoffice.org/
[ please don't fullquoute. thanks ]
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 09:17:27AM -0500, Dan Lewis wrote:
> >Eh, Obviously not. the MySQL *server* installed does not say anything on
> >whether you have the mysql client library *development files* installed
> >(libmysqlclient-dev on Debian-based stuff, s
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 08:59:02AM +0100, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
> > 3) /./autogen.sh //--enable-ext-mysql-connector --with-system-mysql/
> >*Error*: /checking whether to build the MySQL Connector extension... yes
> > checking for MySQL prerequisites... external MySQL//
>
> > //checkin
iHi,
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 06:57:53AM +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Ho hum; the Raspberry Pi version is mostly Rene's work with the Debian
> packages; I'd stick to just having the Linux + ARM architecture for that
> rather than a specific one (unless you really think it helps).
I agree wt
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 04:37:57PM +0100, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
> Fridrich Strba schrieb:
>
> >If you've a bit of time, please give them a try & report bugs not yet in
> >bugzilla.
>
>
> I really would like to learn what the reason of that instruction
> might be. I can't see any advantage
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 09:29:34AM +0100, Alex Thurgood wrote:
> > AA: + disable Rhino / Beanshell unless in experimental mode
> > (Michael)
> > + for future deprecation / removal.
> > + upgrade bundled python to 3.0
>
> Surely, shouldn't we be promoting access to UNO
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 03:53:00PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 03:45:11PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 17:25 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> > > Just as an hint. Ubuntu/Debian would use something like:
> > >
>
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 03:45:11PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 17:25 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> > Just as an hint. Ubuntu/Debian would use something like:
> >
> > 3.6.0~alpha1
> > 3.6.0~alpha1+daily20120606
> > 3.6.0~beta1
> > 3.6.0.1
>
> I really like it. I
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:38:37PM +0200, Cor Nouws wrote:
> Imagine someone looking at our website and seeing "Do I want to
> upgrade to LibreOffice 3.5?" with links to 'blocker issues' (1) we
> may miss two important things in communication with our public:
> - it easily gives the perception
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 02:14:01PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> Also detecting the tag might be a bit error prone. If you want to
> extract a tag in git, it creates just another branch. I am not sure how
> to safely detect that it was created from a branch.
And if you build from source tarball
16 matches
Mail list logo
