Hi :)
I would love one but i think Hazel, Jean, Peter and many others in here
deserve them a LOT more than me!
Regards from
Tom :)
On 6 March 2015 at 15:14, Joel Madero wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We have two netbooks (Windows 8 but you could probably dual boot with
> Linux) that were bought for QA tha
Hi :)
A big
+1
from me! I guess there might be "teething problems" but hopefully we
can all be patient with those and just enjoy the advantages of the new
system more and more :)
Many thanks and regards from
Tom :)
On 25 January 2015 at 09:22, Florian Effenberger
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Robinson T
Hi :)
I think make a sub-page called something like "Further Details" or
"Advanced" or "FAQ-QA" or something like that and then take all that
valuable work and dump it in their instead. Then people getting to the
front page get the simple approach that assumes everything goes smoothly
and can clic
Hi :)
Ubuntu users can use the same resources as everyone else to get the full range
of localisations.
Their PPA's are an additional resource but Ubuntu Users (such as me) could go
to the main LibreOffice website (as i do) to get all the latest stuff.
I think there are even instructions s
Hi :)
WoooHooo!! Congrats! That is really quite awesome to hear about :)
Congrats and regards from
Tom :)
>
> From: Dan Lewis
>To: us...@global.libreoffice.org
>Cc: LibreOffice QA
>Sent: Friday, 22 February 2013, 13:02
>Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] R
ion, preferably as sub-sub-sub-pages off the
Published page.
Unfortunately that would mean moving a lot of pages.
Regards from
Tom :)
>
> From: Robinson Tryon
>To: Tom Davies
>Cc: Sophie Gautier ;
>"documentat...@global.libreoff
Hi :)
I think you have all earned a break!
Good work all!
Regards from
Tom :)
>
> From: Joel Madero
>To: "us...@global.libreoffice.org" ;
>libreoffice-dev ; Libreoffice-qa
>
>Sent: Thursday, 7 February 2013, 19:31
>Subject: [libreoffice-users] [LibreOffice
Hi :)
No. At least i think the answer to that is no
I think "how many might" is a moving target. At the moment those devices are
probably not seen as good things to use to edit documents.
Pi is more about learning programming and building bits of hardware. Android
is more about just c
Hi :)
The workflow for the NA DVD Project involves
1. downloading the installer files from the LO or TDF servers
2. bundling it with some documentation, Extensions and 3rd party programs
3. re-uploading the resulting .iso through a domestic line that takes
somewhere between 4-8hours (assuming
Hi :)
In bug-reports there are several drop-downs. One has "feature request" and i
think another has "Easy hack"? Would one of those be better than the other?
Which of those was which option of the a, b, c etc?
Regards from
Tom :)
>
> From: Ti tengo d'o
ce-qa] Uploading Edited
Manual
To: documentat...@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Thursday, 14 June, 2012, 12:00
I disagree. The changed document should be checked by someone on the
team (for example, me) before replacing anything on the wiki.
--Jean
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Tom Davies
Hi :)
I think, in this case, that it might be better to just upload straight to the
wiki
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Documentation/Publications
ODFAuthors is for proof-reading and all the rest of the process. This case
sounds like it is probably ready to go straight to the wiki. Please
12 matches
Mail list logo
